In A. Papafragou (ed.), Proceedings of the 38th Annual Conference of Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX, USA: pp. 2399-2404 (2016)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
Talk of levels is everywhere in cognitive science. Whether it is in terms of adjudicating longstanding debates or motivating foundational concepts, one cannot go far without hearing about the need to talk at different ‘levels’. Yet in spite of its widespread application and use, the concept of levels has received little sustained attention within cognitive science. This paper provides an analysis of the various ways the notion of levels has been deployed within cognitive science. The paper begins by introducing and motivating discussion via four representative accounts of levels. It then turns to outlining and relating the four accounts using two dimensions of comparison. The result is the creation of a conceptual framework that maps the logical space of levels talk, which offers an important step toward making sense of levels talk within cognitive science.
|
Keywords | Epistemic Levels Ontic Conceptual Framework Marr |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Buy the book |
Find it on Amazon.com
|
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Foregrounding and backgrounding: a new interpretation of “levels” in science.Eric Hochstein - 2022 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 12 (2):1-22.
Similar books and articles
Levels of Description in Nonclassical Cognitive Science.Terence E. Horgan & John L. Tienson - 1992 - Philosophy 34:159-188.
Levels of Description in Nonclassical Cognitive Science.Terence Horgan & John Tienson - 1993 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 34:159-188.
Mechanisms in Cognitive Science.Carlos Zednik - 2017 - In Phyllis McKay Illari & Stuart Glennan (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Mechanisms and Mechanical Philosophy. London: Routledge. pp. 389-400.
A Nonclassical Framework for Cognitive Science.Terence E. Horgan & John L. Tienson - 1994 - Synthese 101 (3):305-45.
Thirty Years After Marr's Vision: Levels of Analysis in Cognitive Science.David Peebles & Richard P. Cooper - 2015 - Topics in Cognitive Science 7 (2):187-190.
Bayesian Models and Simulations in Cognitive Science.Giuseppe Boccignone & Roberto Cordeschi - 2007 - Workshop Models and Simulations 2, Tillburg, NL.
Interactive Effects of Explicit Emergent Structure: A Major Challenge for Cognitive Computational Modeling.Robert M. French & Elizabeth Thomas - 2015 - Topics in Cognitive Science 7 (2):206-216.
Levels of Explanation Vindicated.Víctor M. Verdejo & Daniel Quesada - 2011 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 2 (1):77-88.
What Levels of Explanation in the Behavioural Sciences?Giuseppe Boccignone & Roberto Cordeschi (eds.) - 2015 - Frontiers Media SA.
On the Relation Between Marr's Levels: A Response to Blokpoel.Richard P. Cooper & David Peebles - 2018 - Topics in Cognitive Science 10 (3):649-653.
Levels of Description and Explanation in Cognitive Science.William Bechtel - 1994 - Minds and Machines 4 (1):1-25.
Rational Use of Cognitive Resources: Levels of Analysis Between the Computational and the Algorithmic.Thomas L. Griffiths, Falk Lieder & Noah D. Goodman - 2015 - Topics in Cognitive Science 7 (2):217-229.
Marr’s Three Levels: A Re-Evaluation. [REVIEW]Ron McClamrock - 1990 - Minds and Machines 1 (May):185-196.
On the Relation Between Marr's Levels: A Response to Blokpoel.Richard P. Cooper & David Peebles - 2017 - Topics in Cognitive Science 9 (2).
Analytics
Added to PP index
2019-07-10
Total views
150 ( #77,862 of 2,505,176 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
15 ( #54,103 of 2,505,176 )
2019-07-10
Total views
150 ( #77,862 of 2,505,176 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
15 ( #54,103 of 2,505,176 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads