Is violation pornography bad for your soul?

Journal of Social Philosophy 35 (3):349–366 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Violation pornography is pornography where the depicted behavior includes unjust sexual acts, e.g., rape. In this paper I argue that it is unclear whether the enjoyment of violation pornography is bad for the viewer. My essay has three parts. First, I set out an account of flourishing. I adopt a composite account, whereby flourishing is a function of the degree to which an individual has pleasure and various objective-list elements. Objective-list elements are things (e.g., knowledge and meaningful relationships) that make my life go better independently of their effects on pleasure and desire-fulfillment. In the next two parts, I relate violation pornography to each component of flourishing. Thus, in the second part, I explore whether violation pornography promotes or hinders pleasure. In the third part I explore whether pornography is compatible with these objective-list elements, particularly virtue.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
149 (#122,736)

6 months
5 (#652,053)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Stephen Kershnar
Fredonia State University

References found in this work

Sexual perversion.Thomas Nagel - 1969 - Journal of Philosophy 66 (1):5-17.
Two kinds of organic unity.Thomas Hurka - 1998 - The Journal of Ethics 2 (4):299-320.
On the Intrinsic Value of Pleasures.Fred Feldman - 1997 - Ethics 107 (3):448-466.
Naughty Fantasies.John Corvino - 2002 - Southwest Philosophy Review 18 (1):213-220.

View all 7 references / Add more references