New York: Routledge (
2021)
Copy
BIBTEX
Abstract
This book argues that no one deserves anything. If this is correct, then sentences that claim that people deserve general things (for example, a life that goes well) or specific things (for example, a particular salary) are false. So are sentences that deny these things if we understand them to assert that people can deserve things even if the individual or group in question does not deserve the thing in question.
My argument against desert rests on three claims.
(1) There is no adequate theory of what desert is.
(2) Even if there were an adequate theory of what desert is, nothing grounds (justifies) desert.
(3) Even if there were an adequate theory of what desert is and something grounds it, there is no plausible account of what people deserve.
The third claim, (3), rests on arguments about general and specific desert. The argument about general desert, (3a), is that there is no satisfactory account of how much well-being people deserve. The argument about specific desert, (3b), is that there is no satisfactory account of individuals deserving specific things such as income, love, and punishment.