A scoping review of the perceptions of death in the context of organ donation and transplantation

BMC Medical Ethics 22 (1):1-20 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

BackgroundSocio-cultural perceptions surrounding death have profoundly changed since the 1950s with development of modern intensive care and progress in solid organ transplantation. Despite broad support for organ transplantation, many fundamental concepts and practices including brain death, organ donation after circulatory death, and some antemortem interventions to prepare for transplantation continue to be challenged. Attitudes toward the ethical issues surrounding death and organ donation may influence support for and participation in organ donation but differences between and among diverse populations have not been studied.ObjectivesIn order to clarify attitudes toward brain death, organ donation after circulatory death and antemortem interventions in the context of organ donation, we conducted a scoping review of international English-language quantitative surveys in various populations.Study appraisalA search of literature up to October 2020 was performed, using multiple databases. After screening, 45 studies were found to meet pre-specified inclusion criteria.Results32 studies examined attitudes to brain death, predominantly in healthcare professionals. In most, around 75% of respondents accepted brain death as equivalent to death of the person. Less common perspectives included equating death with irreversible coma and willingness to undertake organ donation even if it caused death. 14 studies examined attitudes to organ donation following circulatory death. Around half of respondents in most studies accepted that death could be confidently diagnosed after only 5 min of cardiorespiratory arrest. The predominant reason was lack of confidence in doctors or diagnostic procedures. Only 6 studies examined attitudes towards antemortem interventions in prospective organ donors. Most respondents supported minimally invasive procedures and only where specific consent was obtained.ConclusionsOur review suggests a considerable proportion of people, including healthcare professionals, have doubts about the medical and ethical validity of modern determinations of death. The prognosis of brain injury was a more common concern in the context of organ donation decision-making than certainty of death.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Truthfulness in transplantation: non-heart-beating organ donation.Michael Potts - 2007 - Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 2:17-.
Organ Donation in an African Culture.Ayinde Jamiu Kunle - 2020 - Bangladesh Journal of Bioethics 10 (1):21-25.
A Survey On The Attitudes Of 252 Japanese Nurses 72 Towards Organ Transplantation And Brain Death.Ralph Seewald - 2000 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 10 (3):72-75.
Lethal Organ Donation: Would the Doctor Intend the Donor’s Death?Ben Bronner - 2019 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 44 (4):442-458.
Reevaluating the Dead Donor Rule.Mike Collins - 2010 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (2):1-26.
Imminent Death Donation: Ethical and Practical Policy Considerations.Jordan Potter - 2018 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 46 (2):524-537.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-12-19

Downloads
28 (#553,203)

6 months
12 (#203,353)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Cynthia Forlini
University of Sydney
Michael O'Leary
Universität Basel

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations