Central problems in the philosophy of the social sciences after postmodernism: Reconciling consensus and hegemonic theories of epistemology and political ethics

Philosophy and Social Criticism 19 (2):145-169 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On the Relevance of Political Philosophy to Business Ethics.Jeffrey Moriarty - 2005 - Business Ethics Quarterly 15 (3):455-473.
Introducing social theory.Pip Jones - 2003 - Malden, MA USA: Distributed in the USA by Blackwell. Edited by Pip Jones.
Social Life and Social Science: The Significance of the Naturalist/Intentionalist Dispute.Nancy C. M. Hartsock - 1980 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:325 - 345.
Hierarchy of scientific consensus and the flow of dissensus over time.Kyung-Man Kim - 1996 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 26 (1):3-25.
Ethics by committee: The moral authority of consensus.Jonathan D. Moreno - 1988 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 13 (4):411-432.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
123 (#143,508)

6 months
4 (#790,687)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Knowledge and human interests.Jürgen Habermas - 1971 - London [etc.]: Heinemann Educational.
Phenomenology of Spirit.Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel - 1977 - Oxford: Oxford University Press. Edited by Arnold V. Miller & J. N. Findlay.

View all 17 references / Add more references