Disciplinary stereotypes and reinventing the wheel on culture

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):31-32 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Gintis argues that disciplinary models of human behavior are incompatible. However, his depiction of the discipline of anthropology relies on a broad generalization that is not supported by current practice. Gintis also ignores the work of cognitive anthropologists, who have developed theories and methods that are highly compatible with the perspective advocated by Gintis. (Published Online April 27 2007).

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Internalism’s Wheel.Michael Smith - 1995 - Ratio 8 (3):277-302.
Gintis meets Brunswik – but fails to recognize him.Kenneth R. Hammond - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):29-29.
Rationality versus program-based behavior.Geoffrey M. Hodgson - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):29-30.
More obstacles on the road to unification.Eric Alden Smith - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):41-41.
Towards the unity of the human behavioral sciences.Herbert Gintis - 2004 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 3 (1):37-57.
Reinventing the Wheel. Bodhipaksa - 2001 - Spiritual Goods 2001:33-54.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
12 (#1,054,764)

6 months
1 (#1,533,009)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references