European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 17 (2):(SI2)5-25 (2021)

Ashley Kennedy
Florida Atlantic University
Bryan Cwik
Portland State University
Diagnostic testing can be used for many purposes, including testing to facilitate the clinical care of individual patients, testing as an inclusion criterion for clinical trial participation, and both passive and active surveillance testing of the general population in order to facilitate public health outcomes, such as the containment or mitigation of an infectious disease. As such, diagnostic testing presents us with ethical questions that are, in part, already addressed in the literature on clinical care as well as clinical research (such as the rights of patients to refuse testing or treatment in the clinical setting or the rights of participants in randomized controlled trials to withdraw from the trial at any time). However, diagnostic testing, for the purpose of disease surveillance also raises ethical issues that we do not encounter in these settings, and thus have not been much discussed. In this paper we will be concerned with the similarities and differences between the ethical considerations in these three domains: clinical care, clinical research, and public health, as they relate to diagnostic testing specifically. Via an examination of the COVID-19 case we will show how an appeal to the concept of diagnostic justice helps us to make sense of the (at times competing) ethical considerations in these three domains.
Keywords diagnostic justice   philosophy of medicine   political philosophy   applied ethics
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,259
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Implications of Meaning for the Validity of Diagnostic Categories.David Trafimow - 2010 - Dialogues in Philosophy, Mental and Neuro Sciences 3 (1):23-24.
Medical Uncertainty, Diagnostic Testing, and Legal Liability.Eric E. Fortess & Marshall B. Kapp - 1985 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 13 (5):213-218.
Medical Uncertainty, Diagnostic Testing, and Legal Liability.Eric E. Fortess & Marshall B. Kapp - 1985 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 13 (5):213-218.
Competing Conceptions of Diagnostic Reasoning – is There a Way Out?Reidun Førde - 1998 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 19 (1):59-72.
The Role of PTSD in Adjudicating Violent Crimes.Mark B. Hamner - 2014 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 42 (2):155-160.


Added to PP index

Total views
8 ( #1,010,272 of 2,518,703 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #271,822 of 2,518,703 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes