Oxford University Press (2001)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
Is it ever possible for people to act freely and intentionally against their better judgement? Is it ever possible to act in opposition to one's strongest desire? If either of these questions are answered in the negative, the common-sense distinctions between recklessness, weakness of will and compulsion collapse. This would threaten our ordinary notion of self-control and undermine our practice of holding each other responsible for moral failure. So a clear and plausible account of how weakness of will and self-control are possible is of great practical significance.Taking the problem of weakness of will as her starting point, Jeanette Kennett builds an admirably comprehensive and integrated account of moral agency which gives a central place to the capacity for self-control. Her account of the exercise and limits of self-control vindicates the common-sense distinction between weakness of will and compulsion and so underwrites our ordinary allocations of moral responsibility. She addresses with clarity and insight a range of important topics in moral psychology, such as the nature of valuing and desiring, conceptions of virtue, moral conflict, and the varieties of recklessness - and does so in terms which make their relations to each other and to the challenges of real life obvious. Agency and Responsibility concludes by testing the accounts developed of self-control, moral failure, and moral responsibility against the hard cases provided by acts of extreme evil.
|
Keywords | Ethics Will Self-control |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Reprint years | 2003 |
Buy this book | $58.45 new (15% off) $65.30 from Amazon (5% off) Amazon page |
Call number | BJ45.K46 2001 |
ISBN(s) | 0198236581 9780199266302 0199266301 9780198236580 |
DOI | 10.1093/mind/111.444.876 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Will the Real Moral Judgment Please Stand Up?: The Implications of Social Intuitionist Models of Cognition for Meta-Ethics and Moral Psychology.Jeanette Kennett & Cordelia Fine - 2009 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12 (1):77-96.
Psychopathology and the Ability to Do Otherwise.Hanna Pickard - 2015 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 90 (1):135-163.
What is the Difference Between Weakness of Will and Compulsion?August Gorman - forthcoming - Journal of the American Philosophical Association:1-16.
Do Psychopaths Really Threaten Moral Rationalism?Jeanette Kennett - 2006 - Philosophical Explorations 9 (1):69 – 82.
View all 37 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
Jeanette Kennett, Agency and Responsibility: A Common-Sense Moral Psychology, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 2001, Pp. Viii + 229. [REVIEW]James Lenman - 2003 - Utilitas 15 (3):380.
Group Agency, Responsibility, and Control.Anders Strand - 2013 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 43 (2):201-224.
Responsibility, Control, and Omissions.John Martin Fischer - 1997 - The Journal of Ethics 1 (1):45-64.
Moral Responsibility and Motivational Mechanisms.James D. Steadman - 2012 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (4):473 - 492.
Commonsense Psychology, Dual Visual Streams, and the Individuation of Action.Thor Grünbaum - 2012 - Philosophical Psychology 25 (1):25 - 47.
Review of Agency and Responsibility: A Common-Sense Moral Psychology. [REVIEW]Daniel Cohen - 2003 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (3):444 – 445.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
86 ( #137,005 of 2,519,698 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #166,865 of 2,519,698 )
2009-01-28
Total views
86 ( #137,005 of 2,519,698 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #166,865 of 2,519,698 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads