Two for the Knowledge Goal of Inquiry

American Philosophical Quarterly 51 (3):227-32 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Suppose you ask yourself whether your father's record collection includes a certain recording of The Trout and venture to find out. At that time, you embark on an inquiry into whether your father owns the relevant recording. Your inquiry is a project with a specific goal: finding out whether your father owns the recording. This fact about your inquiry generalizes: inquiry is a goal-directed enterprise. A specific inquiry can be individuated by the question it aims to answer and by who aims to answer the question. Your inquiry into whether your father owns the recording differs from your inquiry into how many records your father owns because different questions are being asked. Your inquiry into whether your father owns the recording differs from my inquiry into whether he does because different people are inquiring. The goal of inquiry into a given question by an agent, α, can be characterized, neutrally, as α's having the answer to that question. I will here focus only on inquiries into whether questions and characterize the goal of inquiry into whether φ by α as α's having the answer to the question whether φ.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Measure of Knowledge.Nick Treanor - 2012 - Noûs 47 (3):577-601.
Defining Knowledge.Sally Haslanger - 2000 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 8:41-55.
Pure Science and the Posthuman future.Riccardo Campa - 2008 - Journal of Evolution and Technology 19 (1):28-34.
Ought to Believe, Evidential Understanding and the Pursuit of Wisdom.Christos Kyriacou - 2016 - In Pedro Schmechtig & Martin Grajner (eds.), Epistemic Reasons, Norms and Goals. De Gruyter. pp. 383-406.
Politics for Learning or Learning for Politics?Bengt Molander - 2002 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 21 (4/5):361-376.
Science, Knowledge, Wisdom and the Public Good.Nicholas Maxwell - 2003 - Scientists for Global Responsibility Newsletter 1 (26 February 2003):7-9.
The epistemic significance of consensus.Aviezer Tucker - 2003 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 46 (4):501 – 521.
How to attain enlightenment: the vision of non-duality.James Swartz - 2009 - Boulder, Colo.: Sentient Publications.
Historical objectivity and value neutrality.James Leach - 1968 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 11 (1-4):349 – 367.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-05-04

Downloads
181 (#104,260)

6 months
26 (#106,624)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Christoph Kelp
University of Glasgow

Citations of this work

The Epistemic and the Zetetic.Jane Friedman - 2020 - Philosophical Review 129 (4):501-536.
The Knowledge Norm for Inquiry.Christopher Willard-Kyle - 2023 - Journal of Philosophy 120 (11):615-640.
Should epistemology take the zetetic turn?Arianna Falbo - 2023 - Philosophical Studies 180 (10-11):2977-3002.
Inquiring Minds Want to Improve.Arianna Falbo - 2023 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 101 (2).

View all 44 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Knowledge and its limits.Timothy Williamson - 2000 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Knowledge and Its Limits.Timothy Williamson - 2000 - Philosophy 76 (297):460-464.
Knowledge and its Limits.Timothy Williamson - 2000 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 64 (1):200-201.
Knowledge and Its Limits.Timothy Williamson - 2003 - Philosophical Quarterly 53 (210):105-116.

View all 15 references / Add more references