Moral Relativism, Moral Diversity, and Human Relationships

Pennsylvania State University Press (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This book aims to clarify the debate between moral relativists and moral absolutists by showing what is right and what is wrong about each of these positions, by revealing how the phenomenon of moral diversity is connected with moral relativism, and by arguing for the importance of relationships between persons as key to reaching a satisfactory understanding of the issues involved in the debate

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Being a realist about relativism (in ethics).Geoffrey Sayre-McCord - 1991 - Philosophical Studies 61 (1-2):155-176.
Two kinds of moral relativism.John J. Tilley - 1995 - Journal of Value Inquiry 29 (2):187-192.
The Humean Approach to Moral Diversity.Mark Collier - 2013 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 11 (1):41-52.
Moral Relativism in Context.James R. Beebe - 2010 - Noûs 44 (4):691-724.
How good is the linguistic analogy?Susan Dwyer - 2005 - In Peter Carruthers, Stephen Laurence & Stephen P. Stich (eds.), The Innate Mind: Structure and Contents. New York, US: Oxford University Press USA. pp. 145--167.
Moral Relativism.Qun Gong - 2009 - Philosophy and Culture 36 (6):29-43.
A Problem for Harman’s Moral Relativism.William L. Langenfus - 1988 - Philosophy Research Archives 14:121-136.
An Approach to Relativism.Thomas L. Carson - 1999 - Teaching Philosophy 22 (2):161-184.
Moral relativism is moral realism.Gilbert Harman - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (4):855-863.
System relativism.Charles Sayward - 1988 - Ratio 1 (2):163-175.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-06

Downloads
8 (#1,291,989)

6 months
7 (#418,426)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Moral relativism.Christopher Gowans - 2015 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references