- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Can Cognitive Neuroscience Ground a Science of Learning?
Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (1):17-23 (2011)
Abstract
In this article, I review recent findings in cognitive neuroscience in learning, particularly in the learning of mathematics and of reading. I argue that while cognitive neuroscience is in its infancy as a field, theories of learning will need to incorporate and account for this growing body of empirical dataMy notes
Similar books and articles
What Can Neuroscience Bring to Education?Michel Ferrari - 2011 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (1):31-36.
Principles of learning, implications for teaching: A cognitive neuroscience perspective.Usha Goswami - 2008 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 42 (3-4):381-399.
Psychoneural reduction of the genuinely cognitive: Some accomplished facts.John Bickle - 1995 - Philosophical Psychology 8 (3):265-85.
Implications of Affective and Social Neuroscience for Educational Theory.Mary Helen Immordino-Yang - 2011 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (1):98-103.
Educational neuroscience.Kathryn E. Patten & Stephen R. Campbell - 2011 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (1):7-16.
From neural constructivism to cognitive constructivism: The steps to be taken.Andreas Demetriou - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):781-782.
The cognitive neuroscience of sleep: Neuronal systems, consciousness and learning.J. Allan Hobson & Edward F. Pace-Schott - 2002 - Nature Reviews Neuroscience 3:679-93.
Editors' Introduction: Why Formal Learning Theory Matters for Cognitive Science.Sean Fulop & Nick Chater - 2013 - Topics in Cognitive Science 5 (1):3-12.
Automatic Generation of Cognitive Theories using Genetic Programming.Enrique Frias-Martinez & Fernand Gobet - 2007 - Minds and Machines 17 (3):287-309.
On the Necessity of U-Shaped Learning.Lorenzo Carlucci & John Case - 2013 - Topics in Cognitive Science 5 (1):56-88.
You Are Not Your Brain: Against 'Teaching to the Brain'.Gregory M. Nixon - 2012 - Review of Higher Education and Self-Learning 5 (15):69-83.
Analytics
Added to PP
2011-01-08
Downloads
99 (#171,615)
6 months
8 (#342,364)
2011-01-08
Downloads
99 (#171,615)
6 months
8 (#342,364)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Confusions that make us think? An invitation for public attention to conceptual confusion on the neuroscience-education bridge.Joyce Leysen - 2021 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 53 (14):1464-1476.
References found in this work
Core systems of number.Stanislas Dehaene, Elizabeth Spelke & Lisa Feigenson - 2004 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8 (7):307-314.
The Number Sense: How the Mind Creates Mathematics.Stanislas Dehaene - 1999 - British Journal of Educational Studies 47 (2):201-203.
Memory systems do not divide on consciousness: Reinterpreting memory in terms of activation and binding.L. M. Reder, H. Park & P. D. Kieffaber - 2009 - Psychological Bulletin 135 (1).
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-l2pxr uwo