On the supposed obligation to relieve famine

Philosophy 77 (4):503-517 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In an influential paper, Peter Singer claims that affluent people have a strong obligation to relieve famine. If they fail, they allow others to die, and makes them murderers. In responding to this outrageous claim, which has given uneasy conscience to many, I show that Singer is engaged in indefensible moralizing that substitutes bullying for reasoned argument and gives a bad name to morality.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,385

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Famine, Action, and the Normative.Shane Ryan & Fei Song - 2021 - Journal of Value Inquiry 57 (1):59-69.
Moral Deliberation and Ad Hominem Fallacies.Uri D. Leibowitz - 2016 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 13 (5):507-529.
Famine Ethics.Olivier Rubin - 2019 - Food Ethics 4 (2):123-138.
Foreign aid and the moral value of freedom.Martin Peterson - 2004 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 7 (3):293-307.
A ‘Famine, Affluence, and Morality’ for Climate Change?Avram Hiller - 2014 - Public Affairs Quarterly 1 (28):19-39.
Singer, Peter (1946-).Anthony Skelton - 2014 - In Michael T. Gibbons (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Political Thought. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 3454-3455.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
850 (#19,197)

6 months
24 (#147,701)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Kekes
Union College

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references