Trite arguments and hypocrisy: A rejoinder

Criminal Justice Ethics 16 (2):8-10 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
21 (#715,461)

6 months
4 (#818,853)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Keith Burgess-Jackson
University of Texas at Arlington

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Response.Ernest Den Haavang - 1997 - Criminal Justice Ethics 16 (2):7-7.
Sham arguments and capital punishment.Keith Burgess-Jackson - 1997 - Criminal Justice Ethics 16 (2):3-6.
Response.Ernest Van Den Haag - 1997 - Criminal Justice Ethics 16 (2):7-7.

Add more references