Yes We Cannibal Panel Discussion: Reading, Unearthing, and Eating Anthropocentrism with Cesar & Lois

&
Anthropology of Consciousness 33 (2):443-475 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This panel discussion took place on June 26, 2021, as part of the programming for an exhibition by critical art collaborative Cesar & Lois at experimental art and research project space Yes We Cannibal (Baton Rouge, LA). The exhibition was entitled Eat the Anthropocene with Cesar & Lois, mycelia and friend entities and ran for six weeks. The panel discussion collected scholars from art, anthropology, literature, landscape architecture, and amateur Mycology to elucidate themes relevant to the artwork, which features a variety of experimental collaborations between codices and fungal life.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/anoc.12164

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Law school curriculum, training law students, and the vitality of the profession: The judicial perspective - a panel discussion.Judicial Panel - manuscript
Three Types of Anthropocentrism.Ben Mylius - 2018 - Environmental Philosophy 15 (2):159-194.
Cannibal Talk: The Man‐Eating Myth and Human Sacrifice in the South Seas. Gananath Obeyesekere Berkeley, CA: University of California, 2005. Xx + 320 pp. [REVIEW]Sara M. Bergstresser - 2010 - Ethos: Journal of the Society for Psychological Anthropology 38 (1):1-3.
Anthropocentrism: A Misunderstood Problem.Tim Hayward - 1997 - Environmental Values 6 (1):49 - 63.
A Dream of a Stone: The Ethics of De-anthropocentrism.Tsaiyi Wu - 2020 - Open Philosophy 3 (1):413-428.
Reading: Quantifying Beauty: Chad Lavin’s Eating Anxiety.Heather Kettenis - 2014 - Evental Aesthetics 3 (2):32-41.
A direct reading chronoscope with accessories and operating panel.Thomas N. Jenkins - 1936 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 19 (5):630.
Gebt dem Kaiser, was des Kaisers ist! Aber: Was ist des Kaisers? Uberlegungen zur Perikope von der Kaisersteuer (Rendez à César ce qui est à César! Mais qu'est-ce qui appartient à César? Réflexions sur la péricope de l'impôt dû à César).Michael Bunker - 1987 - Kairos (misc) 29 (1-2):85-98.
Common Arguments for the Moral Acceptability of Eating Meat: A Discussion for Students.Dan Lowe - 2016 - Between the Species 19 (1):172-192.
Grant reviewer perceptions of the quality, effectiveness, and influence of panel discussion.Scott R. Glisson, Lisa A. Thompson, Karen B. Schmaling & Stephen A. Gallo - 2020 - Research Integrity and Peer Review 5 (1).
Convergence, Noninstrumental Value and the Semantics of 'Love': Reply to Norton.Katie Mcshane - 2008 - Environmental Values 17 (1):15-21.
Toward a weak anthropocentrism.Stephen H. Webb - 2014 - Zygon 49 (3):761-763.
Eating Meat and Reading Diamond.Andrew Gleeson - 2008 - Philosophical Papers 37 (1):157-175.
Triple Social Construction of Food and Eating.Junkai Jin - 2020 - Дискурс 6 (1):83-95.
Unearthing the Optics of War. [REVIEW]Peter Hobbins - 2018 - Cultural Studeis Review 24 (2):187-190.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-08-16

Downloads
11 (#1,075,532)

6 months
6 (#431,022)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Being singular plural.Jean-Luc Nancy - 2000 - Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.

Add more references