Mind 107 (427):565-579 (1998)

Authors
Rosanna Keefe
University of Sheffield
Abstract
Degree theories of vagueness build on the observation that vague predicates such as 'tall' and 'red' come in degrees. They employ an infinite-valued logic, where the truth values correspond to degrees of truth and are typically represented by the real numbers in the interval [0,1]. In this paper, the success with which the numerical assignments of such theories can capture the phenomenon of vagueness is assessed by drawing an analogy with the measurement of various physical quantities using real numbers. I argue that degree theories of vagueness are undermined by the failure of the necessary connectedness principle. Moreover, the semantics for the connectives entail that there must be a uniquely correct numerical assignment for the sentences, and this is implausible. Different senses of 'coming in degrees' are then distinguished; I argue that a confusion between them could be the source of the degree theorist's error, and the distinction illuminates the problem cases described earlier in the paper.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/mind/107.427.565
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,160
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Measuring and Modelling Truth.Nicholas J. J. Smith - 2012 - American Philosophical Quarterly 49 (4):345-356.
Fuzzy Logic and Higher-Order Vagueness.Nicholas J. J. Smith - 2011 - In Petr Cintula, Christian G. Fermüller, Lluis Godo & Petr Hájek (eds.), Understanding Vagueness: Logical, Philosophical and Linguistic Perspectives. College Publications. pp. 1--19.

View all 16 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Why Vagueness is a Mystery.Peter Inwagen - 2002 - Acta Analytica 17 (2):11-17.
Modelling Vagueness: What Can We Ignore?Rosanna Keefe - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 161 (3):453-470.
Degree of Belief is Expected Truth Value.Nicholas J. J. Smith - 2009 - In Sebastiano Moruzzi & Richard Dietz (eds.), Cuts and Clouds. Vaguenesss, its Nature and its Logic. Oxford University Press. pp. 491--506.
Vagueness as Closeness.Nicholas J. J. Smith - 2005 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 83 (2):157 – 183.
Fuzzy Logic and Higher-Order Vagueness.Nicholas J. J. Smith - 2011 - In Petr Cintula, Christian G. Fermüller, Lluis Godo & Petr Hájek (eds.), Understanding Vagueness: Logical, Philosophical and Linguistic Perspectives. College Publications. pp. 1--19.
Why Vagueness is a Mystery.Peter van Inwagen - 2002 - Acta Analytica 17 (1):11 - 17.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
77 ( #148,648 of 2,499,274 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #418,195 of 2,499,274 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes