Interdisciplinary Imagination and Actionability: Reflections on the Future of Interdisciplinarity

Issues in Interdisciplinary Studies 2 (37):110-129 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

When introduced around 1925, interdisciplinarity, grounded in the notion of the unity of knowledge, was meant to reconnect the fragmented and specialized disciplines of academia. However, interdisciplinary research became more and more challenging as the plurality and heterogeneity of disciplinary perspectives and insights increased. Insisting on this divergence and diversity, Julie Thompson Klein has nonetheless contributed in important ways to convergence in interdisciplinarity with her work on the process of integration as interdisciplinarity's defining feature. Of course, she is aware that the increasing inclusion of extra-academic stakeholders in transdisciplinary research constitutes a fundamental challenge to integrative interdisciplinarity. This challenge implies that next to academic contributions, experiential knowledge, interests, and norms must be recognized as valuable to the process, and stakeholder expectations of applicable results must be met. Exploring the future by extending this crucial development further, this article focuses on the actionability of knowledge as an additional criterion for effective interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity, as it is in Action Research. With action options for stakeholders being an important goal for such research, it is argued that joint deliberation about these options must be part of the process, aiming for reflective equilibrium. At the same time, an important role for imagination is defended, enabling adequate consideration of action options with their ramifications and implications. The future of interdisciplinarity, it is concluded, will entail an important role for the actionability criterion and for the related role of imagination of potential outcomes, much greater roles than these now have.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity.Robert Frodeman, Julie Thompson Klein & Carl Mitcham (eds.) - 2010 - Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity.Robert Frodeman (ed.) - 2010 - Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
How and Why to Teach Interdisciplinary Research Practice.Rick Szostak - 2007 - Journal of Research Practice 3 (2):Article M17.
The interdisciplinarity revolution.Vincenzo Politi - 2019 - Theoria. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science 34 (2):237.
Interdisciplinary Studies. [REVIEW]Г.В Сорина - 2016 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 47 (1):232-237.
Interdisciplinary Studies. [REVIEW]Galina Sorina - 2016 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 47 (1):232-237.
Interdisziplinarität im Entwurf: Zur Geschichte einer Denkform des Erkennens in der Bundesrepublik (1955–1975).Susanne Schregel - 2016 - NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften, Technik und Medizin 24 (1):1-37.
Interdisciplinarity in Philosophy of Science.Marie I. Kaiser, Maria Kronfeldner & Robert Meunier - 2014 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 45 (1):59-70.
Three problems of interdisciplinarity.Yvan I. Russell - 2022 - Avant: Trends in Interdisciplinary Studies 1 (13):1-19.
Interdisciplinarity as Hybrid Modeling.Rolf Hvidtfeldt - 2017 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 48 (1):35-57.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-12-28

Downloads
90 (#174,199)

6 months
48 (#75,853)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Machiel Keestra
University of Amsterdam

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references