Blanchot and Klossowski on the Eternal Return of Nietzsche

Research in Phenomenology 48 (2):155-174 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

_ Source: _Volume 48, Issue 2, pp 155 - 174 What does it mean to say “Yes” to life? What does it mean to affirm life? What does it mean to _not_ be nihilistic? One possible answer is the appropriation of finitude. But Klossowski argues that this amounts to a “voluntarist” fatalism. Though Klossowski draws attention to the temptation of “voluntarist” fatalism on the part of Nietzsche and readers of Nietzsche, he himself is tempted by redemption, i.e., by being redeemed from the weight of responsibility. Using the very “logic” of Klossowski’s own reading of the eternal return, Blanchot will call this possibility of redemption into question. Blanchot’s reading of Nietzsche’s eternal return draws attention to that moment when death as possibility _turns into_ death as impossibility. This _weakening_ of the negative brings, according to Blanchot, _not_ redemption from the burden of responsibility, but infinite responsibility.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 89,491

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Nietzsche and the Vicious Circle.Pierre Klossowski - 1997 - University of Chicago Press.
Maurice Blanchot: The Fragment and the Whole.Lycette Nelson - 1992 - Dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo
Nietzsche’s Convalescence.Philip N. Lawton - 1987 - Philosophy Research Archives 13:151-179.
Nietzsche’s Convalescence.Philip N. Lawton - 1987 - Philosophy Research Archives 13:151-179.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-06-21

Downloads
24 (#555,404)

6 months
2 (#642,987)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references