The Toxin Puzzle

Analysis 43 (1):33-36 (1983)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/analys/43.1.33

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Why the Hardest Logic Puzzle Ever Cannot Be Solved in Less than Three Questions.Gregory Wheeler & Pedro Barahona - 2012 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 41 (2):493-503.
Intentions, reasons, and beliefs: Morals of the toxin puzzle.Alfred R. Mele - 1992 - Philosophical Studies 68 (2):171 - 194.
Autonomous reasons for intending.Randolph Clarke - 2008 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 86 (2):191 – 212.
A simple solution to the hardest logic puzzle ever.Brian Rabern & Landon Rabern - 2008 - Analysis 68 (2):105-112.
Dependency Equilibria and the Causal Structure of Decision and Game Situation.Wolfgang Spohn - unknown
How Action Governs Intention.Nishi Shah - 2008 - Philosophers' Imprint 8:1-19.
How to solve the hardest logic puzzle ever in two questions.Gabriel Uzquiano - 2010 - Analysis 70 (1):39-44.
On the Rationalist Solution to Gregory Kavka's Toxin Puzzle.Ken Levy - 2009 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 90 (2):267-289.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-03-15

Downloads
533 (#32,803)

6 months
35 (#98,014)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The Normativity of Rationality.Benjamin Kiesewetter - 2017 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Why be rational.Niko Kolodny - 2005 - Mind 114 (455):509-563.
Games and the art of agency.C. Thi Nguyen - 2019 - Philosophical Review 128 (4):423-462.
Value and the right kind of reason.Mark Schroeder - 2010 - Oxford Studies in Metaethics 5:25-55.

View all 244 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references