Payam Kavousi Ghahfarokhi, Thomas H. Wilson, Timothy Robert Carr, Abhash Kumar, Richard Hammack & Haibin Di
Interpretation 7 (1):SA1-SA10 (2019)
Abstract |
Microseismic monitoring by downhole geophones, surface seismic, fiber-optic distributed acoustic sensing, and distributed temperature sensing observations were made during the hydraulic fracture stimulation of the MIP-3H well in the Marcellus Shale in northern West Virginia. DAS and DTS data measure the fiber strain and temperature, respectively, along a fiber-optic cable cemented behind the casing of the well. The presence of long-period long-duration events is evaluated in the borehole geophones, DAS data, and surface seismic data of one of the MIP-3H stimulated stages. LPLD events are generally overlooked during the conventional processing of microseismic data, but they represent significant nonbrittle deformation produced during hydraulic fracture stimulation. In a single stage that was examined, 160 preexisting fractures and two faults of suboptimal orientation are noted in the image logs. We identified two low-frequency events of large temporal duration by comparing the surface seismic data, borehole geophone data, and DAS amplitude spectra of one of the MIP-3H stages. Spectrograms of DAS traces in time and depth reveal that the first low-frequency event might be an injection noise that has footprints on all DAS channels above the stimulated stage. However, the surface seismic array indicates an LPLD event concurrent with the first low-frequency event on DAS. The second LPLD event on DAS data and surface seismic data is related to a local deformation and does not have footprints on all DAS channels. The interpreted events have duration less than 100 s with frequencies concentrated below 10 Hz, and are accompanied by microseismic events.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories |
No categories specified (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1190/int-2018-0078.1 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Interrelationships of Marcellus Shale Gas Production to Frac-Induced Microseismicity, Interpreted Minor Faults and Fractures Zones, and Stimulated Reservoir Volume, Greene County, Pennsylvania.Thomas H. Wilson, Ariel K. Hart & Pete Sullivan - 2016 - Interpretation: SEG 4 (1):T15-T30.
Marcellus Shale Model Stimulation Tests and Microseismic Response Yield Insights Into Mechanical Properties and the Reservoir Discrete Fracture Network.Thomas H. Wilson, Tim Carr, B. J. Carney, Malcolm Yates, Keith MacPhail, Adrian Morales, Ian Costello, Jay Hewitt, Emily Jordon, Natalie Uschner, Miranda Thomas, Si Akin, Oluwaseun Magbagbeola, Asbjoern Johansen, Leah Hogarth, Olatunbosun Anifowoshe & Kashif Naseem - 2018 - Interpretation: SEG 6 (2):T231-T243.
Marcellus Shale Model Stimulation Tests and Microseismic Response Yield Insights Into Mechanical Properties and the Reservoir DFN.Thomas H. Wilson, Tim Carr, B. J. Carney, Malcolm Yates, Keith MacPhail, Adrian Morales, Ian Costello, Jay Hewitt, Emily Jordon, Natalie Uschner, Miranda Thomas, Si Akin, Oluwaseun Magbagbeola, Asbjoern Johansen, Leah Hogarth, Olatunbosun Anifowoshe & Kashif Naseem - forthcoming - Interpretation: SEG:1-50.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Interpretation of Fractures and Stress Anisotropy in Marcellus Shale Using Multicomponent Seismic Data.Mehdi E. Far & Bob Hardage - 2014 - Interpretation: SEG 2 (2):SE105-SE115.
Geomechanical Analysis of Microseismicity in an Organic Shale: A West Virginia Marcellus Shale Example.Erich Zorn, Abhash Kumar, William Harbert & Richard Hammack - 2019 - Interpretation 7 (1):T231-T239.
Interpretation of Fractures and Joint Inversion Using Multicomponent Seismic Data — Marcellus Shale Example.Shukun Yuan, Michael V. DeAngelo & Bob A. Hardage - 2014 - Interpretation: SEG 2 (2):SE55-SE62.
Integrated Shale-Gas Reservoir Characterization: A Case Study Incorporating Multicomponent Seismic Data.Laurie M. Weston Bellman - 2018 - Interpretation: SEG 6 (2):SE23-SE37.
Correlation Between Seismic Diffractions Extracted From Vertical Seismic Profiling Data and Borehole Logging in a Carbonate Environment.Alexander Klokov, Damir Irkabaev, Osareni C. Ogiesoba & Nail Munasypov - 2015 - Interpretation: SEG 3 (2):T121-T129.
3D Structural-Orientation Vector Guided Autotracking for Weak Seismic Reflections: A New Tool for Shale Reservoir Visualization and Interpretation.Haibin Di, Dengliang Gao & Ghassan AlRegib - 2018 - Interpretation: SEG 6 (4):SN47-SN56.
Dual-Well 3D Vertical Seismic Profile Enabled by Distributed Acoustic Sensing in Deepwater Gulf of Mexico.Han Wu, Wai-Fan Wong, Zhaohui Yang, Peter B. Wills, Jorge L. Lopez, Yingping Li, Bastian Blonk, Ben Hewett & Albena Mateeva - 2015 - Interpretation: SEG 3 (3):SW11-SW25.
Mineralogy-Based Brittleness Prediction From Surface Seismic Data: Application to the Barnett Shale.Roderick Perez Altamar & Kurt Marfurt - 2014 - Interpretation: SEG 2 (4):T255-T271.
Marcellus Shale Model Stimulation Tests and Microseismic Response Yield Insights Into Mechanical Properties and the Reservoir DFN.Thomas H. Wilson, Tim Carr, B. J. Carney, Malcolm Yates, Keith MacPhail, Adrian Morales, Ian Costello, Jay Hewitt, Emily Jordon, Natalie Uschner, Miranda Thomas, Si Akin, Oluwaseun Magbagbeola, Asbjoern Johansen, Leah Hogarth, Olatunbosun Anifowoshe & Kashif Naseem - forthcoming - Interpretation: SEG:1-50.
Marcellus Shale Model Stimulation Tests and Microseismic Response Yield Insights Into Mechanical Properties and the Reservoir Discrete Fracture Network.Thomas H. Wilson, Tim Carr, B. J. Carney, Malcolm Yates, Keith MacPhail, Adrian Morales, Ian Costello, Jay Hewitt, Emily Jordon, Natalie Uschner, Miranda Thomas, Si Akin, Oluwaseun Magbagbeola, Asbjoern Johansen, Leah Hogarth, Olatunbosun Anifowoshe & Kashif Naseem - 2018 - Interpretation: SEG 6 (2):T231-T243.
Seismic Reservoir Characterization of Utica-Point Pleasant Shale with Efforts at Fracability Evaluation — Part 2: A Case Study.Ritesh Kumar Sharma, Satinder Chopra, James Keay, Hossein Nemati & Larry Lines - 2018 - Interpretation: SEG 6 (2):T325-T336.
Seismic Reservoir Characterization of Utica-Point Pleasant Shale with Efforts at Fracability Evaluation- a Case Study: Part 2.Ritesh Kumar Sharma, Satinder Chopra, James Keay, Hossein Nemati & Larry Lines - forthcoming - Interpretation:1-36.
Seismic Reservoir Characterization of Utica-Point Pleasant Shale with Efforts at Quantitative Interpretation — A Case Study: Part 1.Satinder Chopra, Ritesh Kumar Sharma, Hossein Nemati & James Keay - 2018 - Interpretation: SEG 6 (2):T313-T324.
Seismic Reservoir Characterization of Utica-Point Pleasant Shale with Efforts at Quantitative Interpretation — A Case Study: Part 1.Satinder Chopra, Ritesh Kumar Sharma, Hossein Nemati & James Keay - 2018 - Interpretation 6 (2):T313-T324.
Seismic Reservoir Characterization of Duvernay Shale with Quantitative Interpretation and Induced Seismicity Considerations — A Case Study.Satinder Chopra, Ritesh Kumar Sharma, Amit Kumar Ray, Hossein Nemati, Ray Morin, Brian Schulte & David D’Amico - 2017 - Interpretation: SEG 5 (2):T185-T197.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2019-01-10
Total views
10 ( #903,667 of 2,520,426 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #405,718 of 2,520,426 )
2019-01-10
Total views
10 ( #903,667 of 2,520,426 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #405,718 of 2,520,426 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads