Fearful and Faint‐Hearted: On Affect and the Just‐War Tradition

Journal of Religious Ethics 51 (2):262-279 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the spirit of this group of articles commemorating the fiftieth anniversary of the Journal of Religious Ethics, dealing with tradition-based reasoning, this article takes up a passage from Deuteronomy 20 that allows the “fearful and faint-hearted” person not to participate in battle, as well as the rabbinic and medieval appropriations of this passage in the Jewish tradition. It argues that this verse gives primacy to affect in a way that complicates standard interpretations of the Jewish tradition on just war and allows us to see the pliability of tradition. Finally, the article argues that scholars assessing the justice of conflicts need to attend to the circulation of affects in a reasoning community, as is currently happening on scholarship on moral injury.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Moral psychology of the fading affect bias.Andrew J. Corsa & W. Richard Walker - 2018 - Philosophical Psychology 31 (7):1097-1113.
A Differential Theory of Cinematic Affect.Lisa Åkervall - 2021 - Deleuze and Guattari Studies 15 (4):571-592.
Varieties of affect.Claire Armon-Jones - 1991 - Buffalo: University of Toronto Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-05-21

Downloads
14 (#995,076)

6 months
7 (#439,760)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Ethics after Babel: The Languages of Morals and Their Discontents.Jeffrey Stout - 1993 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 33 (3):189-189.
Appeals to conscience.James F. Childress - 1979 - Ethics 89 (4):315-335.

View all 21 references / Add more references