A new approach to the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox

Foundations of Physics 15 (10):1043-1051 (1985)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Some new aspects of the EPR paradox are considered. We first show that the authors' argument, leading to the conclusion that quantum theory is incomplete, is based on a tacit assumption that may be questioned. We then investigate the non-local features of the EPR setup and point out an interesting connection between the nonlocality involved in the quantum correlations of pairs of particles and that of a single particle in quantum theory

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The physics of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox.B. H. Kellett - 1977 - Foundations of Physics 7 (9-10):735-757.
The Einstein-podolsky-Rosen paradox re-examined.David H. Sharp - 1961 - Philosophy of Science 28 (3):225-233.
Separable hidden variables theory to explain Einstein-podolsky-Rosen paradox.S. V. Bhave - 1986 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 37 (4):467-475.
Einstein, Podolsky, Rosen, and Shannon.Asher Peres - 2005 - Foundations of Physics 35 (3):511-514.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
72 (#207,685)

6 months
3 (#447,120)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references