Terrorism, Emergency Powers, and the Role of the US Supreme Court: An Interview with Neal K. Katyal

Ratio Juris 20 (4):443-455 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The dialogue focuses on the major issues of the contemporary theoretical debate on judicial review and the Supreme Court's role in American constitutional democracy. The discussion begins with the US Supreme Court's case Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, successfully argued by Prof. Katyal last year, and covers important issues such as the separation and balance of powers after 9/11, the legitimacy of the laws of terror, the relation between US constitutional law and foreign law, the counter‐majoritarian difficulties posed by the exercise of judicial review, and the legal academy's influence on legal practice.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-11

Downloads
36 (#417,258)

6 months
4 (#657,928)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Democracy and Distrust.John Hart Ely & Jesse H. Choper - 1983 - Ethics 93 (3):615-618.

Add more references