Do We Need Another Advisory Commission on Human Experimentation?

Hastings Center Report 25 (1):29-31 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Instead of another federal advisory panel to identify ethical principles governing human subjects research, it is time we had a national board with authority to regulate and review such research.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ethics, regulation, and biomedical research.Matthew Weed - 2004 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 14 (4):361-368.
Report on the National Commission: Good as Gold. [REVIEW]George J. Annas - 1980 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 8 (6):4-4.
The ethics and politics of human experimentation.Paul Murray McNeill - 1993 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
The European Convention on bioethics.C. Byk - 1993 - Journal of Medical Ethics 19 (1):13-16.
Ethical Issues in Experimentation on the Human Fetus.LeRoy Walters - 1974 - Journal of Religious Ethics 2 (1):33 - 54.
Inside the beltway again: A sheep of a different feather.Alexander Morgan Capron - 1997 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 7 (2):171-179.
Ethics and regulation of clinical research.Robert J. Levine - 1981 - Baltimore: Urban & Schwarzenberg.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
14 (#968,362)

6 months
6 (#512,819)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

In Defense of the Hopkins Lead Abatement Studies.Lainie Friedman Ross - 2002 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 30 (1):50-57.
In Defense of the Hopkins Lead Abatement Studies.Lainie Friedman Ross - 2002 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 30 (1):50-57.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references