Aristotle's Physics II 1 and Cultivated Plants

Science in Context 31 (4):405-419 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ArgumentThe aim of this paper is two-fold: to offer an interpretation that preserves the natural reading ofPhysicsII 1 – that Aristotle is drawing a stark distinction between what is natural and what is artificial; and to show how there is logical room for atertium quid– a category for things that are products of both nature and art. This aim is attained by highlighting two important qualifications Aristotle makes about the products of art in relation to an innate internal principle of change and pointing out that the proper understanding of the significance of the essential-accidental distinction that Aristotle draws must be viewed in the context where he identifies two kinds of nature – form and matter. Based on these analyses, the following three logical categories are shown to be consistent with the passage: 1) purely natural things; 2) essentially artificial objects; and 3) essentially natural things with artificial aspects.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,659

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-01-12

Downloads
26 (#612,366)

6 months
9 (#456,657)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Aristotle's Metaphysics. Aristotle - 1966 - Clarendon Press.
Aristotle’s Physics.W. D. Ross - 1936 - Philosophy 11 (43):352-354.
Aristotle's Physics.W. D. Ross - 1936 - Mind 45 (179):378-383.
Aristotle’s Biology was not Essentialist.D. M. Balme - 1980 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 62 (1):1-12.
Aristotle on Meaning and Essence.Travis Butler - 2002 - Philosophical Review 111 (2):302.

View all 10 references / Add more references