Technoscientia est Potentia?

Poiesis and Praxis 8 (2-3):125-149 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Within the realm of nano-, bio-, info- and cogno- (or NBIC) technosciences, the ‘power to change the world’ is often invoked. One could dismiss such formulations as ‘purely rhetorical’, interpret them as rhetorical and self-fulfilling or view them as an adequate depiction of one of the fundamental characteristics of technoscience. In the latter case, a very specific nexus between science and technology, or, the epistemic and the constructionist realm is envisioned. The following paper focuses on this nexus drawing on theoretical conceptions as well as empirical material. It presents an overview of different technoscientific ways to ‘change the world’—via contemplation and representation, intervention and control, engineering, construction and creation. It further argues that the hybrid character of technoscience makes it difficult (if not impossible) to separate knowledge production from real world interventions and challenges current science and technology policy approaches in fundamental ways

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Toward an epistemology of nano-technosciences.Jan C. Schmidt - 2011 - Poiesis and Praxis 8 (2-3):103-124.
Elusive memories of technoscience.Barry Barnes - 2005 - Perspectives on Science 13 (2):142-165.
In Defense of Engineering Sciences.Mieke Boon - 2011 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 15 (1):49-71.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-01

Downloads
35 (#445,257)

6 months
16 (#148,627)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Karen Kastenhofer
University of Vienna

Citations of this work

Two sides of the same coin? The epistemic cultures of systems and synthetic biology.Karen Kastenhofer - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44 (2):130-140.

Add more citations