Pragmatics: Critical Concepts: Volume IV: Presupposition, Implicature and Indirect Speech Acts

(ed.)
Routledge (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,139

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Chapters

Postscript (1995) to "Implicature, explicature, and truth-theoretic semantics".Robyn Carston

Similar books and articles

Postscript (1995) to "Implicature, explicature, and truth-theoretic semantics".Robyn Carston - 1998 - In Asa Kasher (ed.), Pragmatics: Critical Concepts: Volume IV: Presupposition, Implicature and Indirect Speech Acts. Routledge. pp. 464-479.
Speech Acts and Indirect Threats in Ad Baculum Arguments. A Reply to Budzynska and Witek: Comment to: Non-Inferential Aspects of Ad Hominem and Ad Baculum.Douglas Walton - 2014 - Argumentation 28 (3):317-324.
The Oxford Handbook of Pragmatics.Yan Huang (ed.) - 2016 - Oxford University Press UK.
The rhetorical relations approach to indirect speech acts: Problems and prospects. [REVIEW]Lenny Clapp - 2009 - Pragmatics and Cognition 17 (1):43-76.
Indirect speech acts.Nicholas Asher & Alex Lascarides - 2001 - Synthese 128 (1-2):183 - 228.
Presupposition and Implicature in Compositional Semantics.Uli Sauerland & Penka Stateva (eds.) - 2007 - Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Telling more than the truth: Implicature, speech acts, and ethics in professional communication. [REVIEW]Kathryn Riley - 1993 - Journal of Business Ethics 12 (3):179 - 196.
Some Remarks on Explicit Performatives, Indirect Speech Acts, Locutionary Meaning and Truth-value.Francois Recanati - 1980 - In John Searle, F. Kiefer & Manfred Berwisch (eds.), Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics. Dordrecht. pp. 205-220.
“On Indirect Speech Acts and Linguistic Communication: A Response to Bertolet”1: McGowan, Tam and Hall.Mary Kate McGowan, Shan Shan Tam & Margaret Hall - 2009 - Philosophy 84 (4):495-513.
Why metaphors make good insults: perspectives, presupposition, and pragmatics.Elisabeth Camp - 2017 - Philosophical Studies 174 (1):47--64.
Speech act conditions as tools for reconstructing argumentative discourse.FransH Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst - 1989 - Argumentation 3 (4):367-383.
Meaning and force: The pragmatics of performative utterances.François Récanati - 1987 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Speech act conditions as tools for reconstructing argumentative discourse.Frans H. van Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst - 1989 - Argumentation 3 (4):367-383.
Indirect Speech Acts Revisited.Johan van der Auwera - 1980 - Reproduced by the Indiana University Linguistics Club.
Embedding Speech Acts.Manfred Krifka - unknown

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-09-26

Downloads
1 (#1,841,214)

6 months
1 (#1,346,405)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references