Author’s Response: Informing Metaphysical Choices with Epistemic Considerations

Constructivist Foundations 13 (3):357-361 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Upshot: It is admittedly difficult, if at all possible, to establish a direct, positive logical bridge from epistemic considerations to ontological conclusions. Yet, epistemic considerations can and should inform metaphysical choices, for all we ultimately have for making these choices is our knowledge. More accurately, all we finally have is the mind - sole given of existence - upon which our knowledge resides and within which our metaphysical choices are made.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ontological Choices and the Value-Free Ideal.David Ludwig - 2016 - Erkenntnis 81 (6):1253-1272.
Full information and ideal deliberation.Valerie Tiberius - 1997 - Journal of Value Inquiry 31 (3):329-338.
Why There are No Epistemic Duties.Chase B. Wrenn - 2007 - Dialogue: The Canadian Philosophical Review 46 (1):115-136.
Lockeans Maximize Expected Accuracy.Kevin Dorst - 2019 - Mind 128 (509):175-211.
Boghossian on analyticity.E. Margolis & S. Laurence - 2001 - Analysis 61 (4):293-302.
Knowing Things in Themselves.M. Oreste Fiocco - 2017 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 94 (3):332-358.
African communal basis for autonomy and life choices.Polycarp Ikuenobe - 2017 - Developing World Bioethics 18 (3):212-221.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-08-12

Downloads
33 (#472,429)

6 months
9 (#290,637)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Bernardo Kastrup
Radboud University (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references