A Puzzle About Ontological Commitments: Reply to Ebert

Philosophia Mathematica 18 (1):102-105 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This note refutes P. Ebert’s argument against Epistemic Rejectionism

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/philmat/nkp021

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Fiction's ontological commitments.Christopher Mole - 2009 - Philosophical Forum 40 (4):473-488.
How to Express Ontological Commitment in the Vernacular.Jamin Asay - 2010 - Philosophia Mathematica 18 (3):293-310.
Ontological infidelity.Patrick Dieveney - 2008 - Synthese 165 (1):1 - 12.
Ill-equipped.Rebecca Helene Ebert - unknown
Presence.Rebecca Helene Ebert - unknown
Epistemic and Ontic Commitments: In Perfect Alignment?Ioannis Votsis - unknown
The iamb is my friend.Rebecca Helene Ebert - unknown
A Puzzle About Ontological Commitments.Philip A. Ebert - 2008 - Philosophia Mathematica 16 (2):209-226.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-02-06

Downloads
61 (#257,990)

6 months
1 (#1,533,009)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Is Hume's principle analytic?G. Boolos - 1998 - Logic, Logic, and Logic:301--314.
Aristotelian logic, axioms, and abstraction.Roy T. Cook - 2003 - Philosophia Mathematica 11 (2):195-202.
A Puzzle About Ontological Commitments.Philip A. Ebert - 2008 - Philosophia Mathematica 16 (2):209-226.

Add more references