- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
WEIRD walking: Cross-cultural research on motor development
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (2-3):95-96 (2010)
Abstract
Motor development – traditionally studied in WEIRD populations – falls victim to assumptions of universality similar to other domains described by Henrich et al. However, cross-cultural research illustrates the extraordinary diversity that is normal in motor skill acquisition. Indeed, motor development provides an important domain for evaluating cultural challenges to a general behavioral science.Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Ethical Challenges for Cross-Cultural Research Conducted by Psychologists From the United States.Frederick T. L. Leong & Brent Lyons - 2010 - Ethics and Behavior 20 (3-4):250-264.
Cross-cultural methodological issues in ethical research.Gael McDonald - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics 27 (1-2):89 - 104.
Emancipation in cross-cultural IS research: The fine line between relativism and dictatorship of the intellectual. [REVIEW]Bernd Carsten Stahl - 2006 - Ethics and Information Technology 8 (3):97-108.
Education, autonomy, and democratic citizenship: philosophy in a changing world.David Bridges (ed.) - 1997 - New York: Routledge.
Is there no cross-cultural evidence in colour categories of psychological laws, only of cultural rules?Ype H. Poortinga & Fons J. R. Van de Vijver - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (2):205-206.
Music Perception and Cognition: A Review of Recent Cross‐Cultural Research. [REVIEW]Catherine J. Stevens - 2012 - Topics in Cognitive Science 4 (4):653-667.
Weirdness is in the eye of the beholder.Will M. Bennis & Douglas L. Medin - 2010 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (2-3):85-86.
The Propositional vs. Hermeneutic Models of Cross-Cultural Understanding.Xinli Wang & Ling Xu - 2009 - South African Journal of Philosophy 28 (3):312-331.
It's not WEIRD, it's WRONG: When Researchers Overlook uNderlying Genotypes, they will not detect universal processes.Lowell Gaertner, Constantine Sedikides, Huajian Cai & Jonathon D. Brown - 2010 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (2-3):93-94.
Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross‐cultural health care research: a clear and user‐friendly guideline.Valmi D. Sousa & Wilaiporn Rojjanasrirat - 2011 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17 (2):268-274.
Cultural differences and the law of noncontradiction: Some criteria for further research.Brian Huss - 2004 - Philosophical Psychology 17 (3):375 – 389.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-20
Downloads
39 (#399,999)
6 months
10 (#255,509)
2014-01-20
Downloads
39 (#399,999)
6 months
10 (#255,509)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
The Emergence of Modern Languages: Has Human Self-Domestication Optimized Language Transmission?Antonio Benítez-Burraco & Vera Kempe - 2018 - Frontiers in Psychology 9.
A roadmap to doing culturally grounded developmental science.Tanya Broesch, Sheina Lew-Levy, Joscha Kärtner, Patricia Kanngiesser & Michelle Kline - 2023 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 14 (2):587-609.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-4c2ch uwo