Global Justice : Theory Practice Rhetoric 8 (2) (2015)
AbstractIt is becoming less and less controversial that we ought to aggressively combat climate change. One main reason for doing so is concern for future generations, as it is they who will be the most seriously affected by it. Surprisingly, none of the more prominent deontological theories of intergenerational justice can explain why it is wrong for the present generation to do very little to stop worsening the problem. This paper discusses three such theories, namely indirect reciprocity, common ownership of the earth and human rights. It shows that while indirect reciprocity and common ownership are both too undemanding, the human rights approach misunderstands the nature of our intergenerational relationships, thereby capturing either too much or too little about what is problematic about climate change. The paper finally proposes a way to think about intergenerational justice that avoids the pitfalls of the traditional theories and can explain what is wrong with perpetuating climate change.
Similar books and articles
Climate Change and Justice Between Nonocerlapping Generations.Anja Karnein - 2015 - Global Justice: Theory Practice Rhetoric 8 (2).
Climate Change, Intergenerational Justice, and the Non-Identity Effect.Thomas D. Bontly - 2020 - Intergenerational Justice Review 5 (2).
Just Adaptation? How the Diffusion of Norms in the Global Climate Regime Affects International Climate Politics.Delf Rothe - 2009 - Intergenerational Justice Review 3 (3).
Climate Change and the Rights of Future Generations: Social Justice Beyond Mutual Advantage.William J. Fitzpatrick - 2007 - Environmental Ethics 29 (4):369-388.
Cosmopolitan Justice, Rights, and Global Climate Change.Simon Caney - 2006 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 19 (2).
Saved by Disaster? Abrupt Climate Change, Political Inertia, and the Possibility of an Intergenerational Arms Race.Stephen M. Gardiner - 2009 - Journal of Social Philosophy 40 (2):140-162.
Climate Change and Political Philosophy: Who Owes What to Whom?Joerg Chet Tremmel - 2013 - Environmental Values 22 (6):725-749.
Climate Change, Intergenerational Equity and the Social Discount Rate.Simon Caney - 2014 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 13 (4):320-342.
Intergenerational Justice.Gosseries Axel & Meyer Lukas - 2009 - Oxford, Royaume-Uni: Oxford University Press.
Climate Change and the Future: Discounting for Time, Wealth, and Risk.Simon Caney - 2009 - Journal of Social Philosophy 40 (2):163-186.
Should There Be Future People? A Fundamental Question for Climate Change and Intergenerational Justice.Pranay Sanklecha - 2017 - WIREs Climate Change 8 (3).
Intergenerational Justice.Axel Gosseries & Lukas H. Meyer - 2009 - Oxford, Royaume-Uni: Oxford University Press.
Justice and Climate Change: Toward a Libertarian Analysis.Dan C. Shahar - 2009 - The Independent Review 14 (2):219-237.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
What’s Wrong with the Presentist Bias? On the Threat of Intergenerational Domination.Anja Karnein - forthcoming - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy:1-22.
Disaggregated Pluralistic Theories of Global Distributive Justice – a Critique.Julian Culp - 2017 - Journal of Global Ethics 13 (2):168-186.
References found in this work
No references found.