A Temperament-Attachment-Mentalization-Based (TAM) Theory of Personality and Its Disorders
Frontiers in Psychology 10 (2019)
Abstract
Theories of personality and personality disorders need, from time to time, to be revised and updated according to new empirical and conceptual developments. Such development has taken place in the realms of affective neuroscience, evolution and social cognition. In this article we outline a new personality theory which claims that phenomena we usually ascribe to the concept personality are best understood by postulating a web consisting of three major constituents: Temperament (mainly primary emotions), attachment and self-consciousness (mentalizing). We describe these constituents, their neurobiological underpinnings, the subjective experiences they evoke and their behavioral implications. We discuss the relevance of the espoused theory for the field of personality disorders with references to borderline, narcissistic and avoidant personality disorders as well as the DSM-5 Alternative Model. Implications for social psychology, psychotherapy and common-sense self-understanding are outlined. The theory aims to bridge previous contradictions between natural sciences and hermeneutics by its propositions of the evolution of self-consciousness.DOI
10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00518
My notes
Similar books and articles
Mentalization within close relationships: The role of specific attachment style.Lidia Cierpiałkowska & Błażej M. Bączkowski - 2015 - Polish Psychological Bulletin 46 (2):285-299.
Is Borderline Personality Disorder a Moral or Clinical Condition? Assessing Charland’s Argument from Treatment.Greg Horne - 2013 - Neuroethics 7 (2):215-226.
Mentalization-Based Treatment for Borderline Personality Disorder: A Practical Guide.Anthony Bateman & Peter Fonagy - 2006 - Oxford University Press UK.
Mentalization, specific attachment, and relational satisfaction from the intrapsychic and interpersonal perspectives.Dominika Górska - 2015 - Polish Psychological Bulletin 46 (3):393-400.
Personality Disorders: Moral or Medical Kinds—Or Both?Peter Zachar & Nancy Nyquist Potter - 2010 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 17 (2):101-117.
Traits across cultures: A neo-Allportian perspective.Brad Piekkola - 2011 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 31 (1):2.
Attachment theory underestimates the child.Judith Rich Harris - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (1):30-30.
Mentalization: Theoretical Considerations, Research Findings, and Clinical Implications.Fredric Busch (ed.) - 2008 - Routledge.
Psychotherapy for Borderline Personality Disorder: Mentalization Based Treatment.Anthony Bateman & Peter Fonagy - 2004 - Oxford University Press UK.
Moral nature of the dsm-IV cluster B personality disorders.Louis Charland - 2006 - Journal of Personality Disorders 20 (2):116-125.
Explaining Personality: Soul Theory versus Behavior Genetics.Jean Mercer - 2015 - In Keith Augustine & Michael Martin (eds.), The Myth of an Afterlife: The Case against Life After Death. Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 69-81.
Cloninger's Psychobiological Model of Personality and Strelau's Regulative Theory of Temperament - analysis of their associations in a Polish sample.Elżbieta Hornowska - 2011 - Polish Psychological Bulletin 42 (2):71-80.
Implicit and Explicit Mentalization and its Relationship to Introspection.Giovanni Valeria - 2015 - Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia 6 (2):272-281.
Language mediated mentalization: A proposed model.Yair Neuman - 2019 - Semiotica 2019 (227):261-272.
The Clinical Nature of Personality Disorders: Answering the Neo-Szaszian Critique.Peter Zachar - 2011 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 18 (3):191-202.
Analytics
Added to PP
2019-03-24
Downloads
7 (#1,045,962)
6 months
1 (#455,463)
2019-03-24
Downloads
7 (#1,045,962)
6 months
1 (#455,463)
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals.Charles Darwin - 2018 - Mineola, New York: Courier Dover Publications.
Sein und Zeit.Martin Heidegger - 1928 - Annalen der Philosophie Und Philosophischen Kritik 7:161-161.