Realizing Public Rights Through Government Patent Use

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 49 (1):34-38 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A substantial portion of biomedical R&D is publicly funded. But resulting medicines are typically covered by patents held by private firms, and priced without regard to the public’s investment. The Bayh-Dole Act provides a possible remedy, but its scope is limited.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Liberalism and intellectual property rights.Hugh Breakey - 2009 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 8 (3):329-349.
Patents and Human Rights: A Heterodox Analysis.E. Richard Gold - 2013 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 41 (1):185-198.
Pesticides and the Patent Bargain.Cristian Timmermann - 2015 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 28 (1):1-19.
Patent rights or patent wrongs? The case of patent rights on AIDS drugs.Paul Davey Samantha Byrne - 2006 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 15 (3):299-305.
Balancing access to pharmaceuticals with patent rights.Dianne Nicol - 2003 - Monash Bioethics Review 22 (2):S50-S62.
Ethical reasons for narrowing the scope of biotech patents.Tom Andreassen - 2015 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 18 (4):463-473.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-04-22

Downloads
8 (#1,249,165)

6 months
5 (#544,079)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references