Authors
Molly Kao
University of Western Ontario
Abstract
The purpose of this dissertation is to contribute to our understanding of scientific theory pursuit by providing a detailed case study on the development of early quantum theory, from roughly 1900 to 1916. I first elaborate on why this case should be considered an instance of piecemeal pursuit by presenting the historical quantum conjectures that were being used in different contexts. These conjectures gave varied interpretations of quantization. By comparing these conjectures, I identify a general quantum postulate that captures the underlying assumption common to all the cases. I argue that it is possible to consider a general postulate about quantization even when its proper application is ambiguous in a given context, and that the postulate can be separated from different elements of the framework being used to investigate it. I show that the quantum postulate can be deemed promising by analysing the support it gains using a Bayesian framework. I first defend the use of such a framework by considering the purported inconsistencies in Planck's introduction of his quantum conjecture and how we should handle these. I then explicate two cases of support for the postulate. First, I show how we can use a particular solution to the Bayesian problem of old evidence to interpret the support the quantum postulate received by accounting for phenomena that had no previous explanation. Finally, I show that the quantum postulate is also supported by a unification argument, where unification is interpreted as informational relevance between the different domains of inquiry.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,959
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Logic of Scientific Discovery.K. Popper - 1959 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (37):55-57.

View all 42 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

A Pluralism Worth Having: Feyerabend's Well-Ordered Science.Jamie Shaw - 2018 - Dissertation, University of Western Ontario

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

On the Observables on Quantum Logics.S. Pulmannová - 1981 - Foundations of Physics 11 (1-2):127-136.
On Classical and Quantum Objectivity.Gabriel Catren - 2008 - Foundations of Physics 38 (5):470-487.
Quantum Logic and the Projection Postulate.Geoffrey Hellman - 1981 - Philosophy of Science 48 (3):469-486.
Von Neumann's Argument for the Projection Postulate.Joseph D. Sneed - 1966 - Philosophy of Science 33 (1/2):22-39.
A Critical Note on the Greatest Days of Quantum Theory.Karl Popper - 1982 - Foundations of Physics 12 (10):971-976.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-08-30

Total views
9 ( #950,226 of 2,504,602 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,529 of 2,504,602 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes