Public Affairs Quarterly 1 (33) (2019)

Laura Kane
Worcester State University
There are many different interpretations of what the family should be – its desired member composition, its primary purpose, and its cultural significance – and many different examples of what families actually look like across the globe. I examine the most paradigmatic conceptions of the family that are based upon the supposed primary purpose that the family serves for its members and for the state. I then suggest that we ought to reconceptualize how we understand and define the family in an effort to move away from these paradigmatic conceptions. This approach requires that we examine the way(s) in which the family has been defined descriptively – that is, how families have been defined historically – in an effort to determine what a normative theory of the family might look like. The goal of this inquiry is to define a family in terms of what it ought to be – a goal that moves our understanding of the family to a new conceptual landscape. I then present my own account of familial relations that aims to capture a normative understanding of the unique primary purpose that the family serves for its members.
Keywords social philosophy  family  ethics of care  social ontology  social group  group purpose
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The German Ideology.Karl Marx & Friedrich Engels - 1975 - In Science and Society. International Publishers. pp. 19-581.
The German Ideology.Karl Marx & Friedrich Engels - 1939 - Science and Society 3 (4):563-568.
Family History.J. David Velleman - 2005 - Philosophical Papers 34 (3):357-378.

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Just Family.Richard Dien Winfield - 1998 - State University of New York Press.
Family Medicine as a Social Science.Barry Hoffmaster - 1981 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 6 (4):387-410.
Must the Family Be Just?Brian Penrose - 2000 - Philosophical Papers 29 (3):189-221.
The Family and Neoliberalism: Time to Revive a Critique.Bob Brecher - 2012 - Ethics and Social Welfare 6 (2):157-167.
Hsun Tzu on Family and Familial Relations.Cecilia Wee - 2007 - Asian Philosophy 17 (2):127 – 139.
The Ethics of the Family in Seneca.Liz Gloyn - 2017 - Cambridge University Press.
Family Fairness.Edna Ullmann-Margalit - 2006 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 73 (2):575-596.
The Impact of the Financial Income on the Family Communication.Andrea Banovcinova & Katarina Levicka - 2015 - Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala 7 (2):35-46.
Building Social and Economic Capital: The Family and Medical Savings Accounts.M. J. Cherry - 2012 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 37 (6):526-544.
Is the Family Uniquely Valuable?Anca Gheaus - 2012 - Ethics and Social Welfare 6 (2):120-131.
Re-Thinking the Role of the Family in Medical Decision-Making.Mark J. Cherry - 2015 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 40 (4):451-472.


Added to PP index

Total views
53 ( #205,895 of 2,463,232 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #78,456 of 2,463,232 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes