Ulm Classification of Analytic Equivalence Relations in Generic Universes

Mathematical Logic Quarterly 44 (3):287-303 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1002/malq.19980440302

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,252

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Cofinal families of Borel equivalence relations and quasiorders.Christian Rosendal - 2005 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 70 (4):1325-1340.
An Ulm-type classification theorem for equivalence relations in Solovay model.Vladimir Kanovei - 1997 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 62 (4):1333-1351.
Analytic equivalence relations and bi-embeddability.Sy-David Friedman & Luca Motto Ros - 2011 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 76 (1):243 - 266.
Analytic equivalence relations and the forcing method.Jindřich Zapletal - 2013 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 19 (4):473-490.
The {L}aczkovich—{K}omjáth property for coanalytic equivalence relations.Su Gao, Steve Jackson & Vincent Kieftenbeld - 2010 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 75 (3):1091-1101.
Classifying positive equivalence relations.Claudio Bernardi & Andrea Sorbi - 1983 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 48 (3):529-538.
Infinite Time Decidable Equivalence Relation Theory.Samuel Coskey & Joel David Hamkins - 2011 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 52 (2):203-228.
Maximal R.e. Equivalence relations.Jeffrey S. Carroll - 1990 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 55 (3):1048-1058.
Thin equivalence relations and effective decompositions.Greg Hjorth - 1993 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 58 (4):1153-1164.
Some applications of illfoundedness.Greg Hjorth - 1996 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 35 (3):131-144.
Simultaneity as an Invariant Equivalence Relation.Marco Mamone-Capria - 2012 - Foundations of Physics 42 (11):1365-1383.
We announce two new dichotomy theorems for Borel equivalence rela-tions, and present the results in context by giving an overview of related recent developments. § 1. Introduction. For X a Polish (ie, separable, completely metrizable) space and E a Borel equivalence relation on X, a (complete) classification. [REVIEW]Greg Hjorth & Alexander S. Kechris - 1997 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 3 (3):329-346.
Review: Greg Hjorth, Alexander S. Kechris, Analytic Equivalence Relations and Ulm-Type Classifications; Greg Hjorth, Alexander S. Kechris, Alain Louveau, Borel Equivalence Relations Induced by Actions of the Symmetric Group. [REVIEW]Sławomir Solecki - 2001 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 7 (4):541-544.
? 0 N -equivalence relations.Andrea Sorbi - 1982 - Studia Logica 41 (4):351-358.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-16

Downloads
21 (#700,240)

6 months
5 (#565,734)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Linearization of definable order relations.Vladimir Kanovei - 2000 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 102 (1-2):69-100.

Add more citations

References found in this work

[Omnibus Review].Thomas Jech - 1992 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 57 (1):261-262.
A dichotomy for the definable universe.Greg Hjorth - 1995 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 60 (4):1199-1207.
Ω*1 as an initial segment of the c-degrees.Marcia Groszek - 1994 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 59 (3):956 - 976.

Add more references