The Free-Will Defense Defended

New Scholasticism 50 (4):435-446 (1976)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The free will defense against the problem of evil has been attacked on the grounds that god could have, without impairing human freedom, acted so that much of the moral evil that has occurred in human life would have been avoided. according to this criticism, he could have done so by creating human beings with a disposition to do what is right. in this article i argue that this criticism is mistaken. i argue that precisely the amount of moral evil that has occurred in human history could have occurred even if human beings originally had the strongest possible disposition to do what is right that is compatible with their being free

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 99,169

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The premortalist free will defense.James Spiegel - 2024 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 95 (1):49-59.
What God Could Have Made.Michael Losonsky & Heimir Geirsson - 2005 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 43 (3):355-376.
Hell, the Problem of Evil, and the Perfection of the Universe.Paul A. Macdonald - 2015 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 89 (4):603-628.
An Attempt to Defend Theism.W. D. Hudson - 1964 - Philosophy 39 (147):18 - 28.
Plantinga and Leibniz’s the Best World.Chansoo Park - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 45:261-264.
On Free Will and Soul Making.James S. Spiegel - 2011 - Philosophia Christi 13 (2):405-413.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
48 (#369,989)

6 months
10 (#310,825)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references