Referential Relation and Beyond: Signifying Functions in Chinese Madhyamaka

Journal of Indian Philosophy 47 (4):851-915 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The Chinese Mādhyamikas Seng Zhao 374–414, Jizang 549–623, and Zhiyi 538–597 try to demonstrate that the linguistic strategies in the textual transmission of the Buddha’s teaching give us access to a sense of “liberation” which reaches beyond language. For them, this ineffable sense is what constitutes the dharma in the shape of sūtra and śāstra. Liberation is considered the constitutive but hidden “root” of all the teachings transmitted via the canonical word, those again account for the Buddha’s “traces” guiding back to the meaning of that root. The practitioner’s comprehension of the dharma must embrace this circular mutuality of “root and traces,” reconciling speech with silence. The article discusses two philosophical aspects: Chinese Madhyamaka semantics and pragmatics exploring the various signifying functions in our use of language, and the hermeneutical approach that the Chinese masters develop in their exegetical works to unravel such a sense of “liberation” in reference to the textual transmission of Indian Mahāyāna thought.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Textual Pragmatics in Early Chinese Madhyamaka.Hans-Rudolf Kantor - 2014 - Philosophy East and West 64 (3):759-784.
The True Meaning of Dharma-Realm.Kai-gei Lee - 2007 - Philosophy and Culture 34 (8):35-47.
Zhu Dao-sheng's Doctrine about Nirvana and Buddh-nature.Ji Lee - 2003 - Philosophy and Culture 30 (7):3-15.
Semantics without Truth in Later Mohist Philosophy of Language.Frank Saunders - 2014 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 13 (2):215-229.


Added to PP

29 (#404,550)

6 months
1 (#448,551)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?