Ontological indeterminacy and its soteriological relevance: An assessment of Mou zhongsan's (1909-1995) interpretation of zhiyi's (538-597) tiantai buddhism [Book Review]
Philosophy East and West 56 (1):16-68 (2006)
Abstract: This is an attempt to clarify a vital ontological aspect of Tiantai teaching created by the sixth-century Chinese Buddhist monk Zhiyi. To do this Tiantai must first be distanced from Mou Zongsan's interpretation of its central pattern of nonduality, a reconstructive theory that refers to both Chinese Buddhism and Confucianism and sees a "two-level ontology" in Chinese philosophical traditions, grounded in both the Chinese Buddhist patterns of "nonduality between the sacred and the profane" and the Kantian distinction between "noumena and phenomena." Part 1 of this article is a critical analysis and evaluation of Mou's theory, concluding that the Buddhist patterns of nonduality and the Kantian distinction are not mutually convertible. Part 2 focuses on Tiantai ontology in the specific context of its soteriological relevance, demonstrating that the ideal of "universally saving all sentient beings" in Tiantai soteriology must presuppose the conception of "nonduality of/between the sacred and the profane," and that the ambiguous ontological status of existing things corresponds to this soteriological doctrine in a manner that can only be expressed by a "paradoxical articulation." The ontological meaning of Tiantai teaching is then specified with regard to Zhiyi's discussion of reality and the diversity of existing things. The three constitutive elements of Tiantai Buddhism—the soteriological doctrine of nonduality, ontological indeterminacy, and paradoxical articulation—are all based on an ideal of universal salvation that excludes a level of "being" transcending the realm of sentient beings. This conclusion directly controverts Mou's metaphysical notion of a "two-level ontology."
Similar books and articles
The Unlikely Buddhologist: Tiantai Buddhism in Mou Zongsan's New Confucianism.Jason T. Clower - 2010 - Brill.
Mou Zongsan’s Ontological Reading of Tiantai Buddhism.Kwan Chun-Keung - 2011 - Journal of Chinese Philosophy 38 (2):206-222.
The Profound Meaning of the Lotus Sutra: T̕ Ien-T̕ai Philosophy of Buddhism.Haiyan Shen - 2005 - D.K. Publishers Distributors.
The tiantai roots of dōgen's philosophy of language and thought.John Spackman - 2006 - Philosophy East and West 56 (3):428-450.
Mind and its "creation" of all phenomena in tiantai buddhism.Brook Ziporyn - 2010 - Journal of Chinese Philosophy 37 (2):156-180.
Clower, Jason: The Unlikely Buddhologist, Tiantai Buddhism inMouZongsan’s New Confucianism: Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2010, 279 pages.Sébastien Billioud - 2012 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 11 (1):101-104.
Problems of religious pluralism: A zen critique of John Hick's ontological monomorphism.Jung H. Lee - 1998 - Philosophy East and West 48 (3):453-477.
Setup, punch line, and the mind-body problem: A neo-tiantai approach.Brook Ziporyn - 2000 - Philosophy East and West 50 (4):584-613.
Mou zongsan, Hegel, and Kant: The Quest for confucian modernity.Stephan Schmidt - 2011 - Philosophy East and West 61 (2):260-302.
Tiantai buddhist conceptions of "the nature" (xing) and its relation to the mind.Brook Ziporyn - 2010 - Journal of Chinese Philosophy 37 (3):493-512.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Referential Relation and Beyond: Signifying Functions in Chinese Madhyamaka.Hans-Rudolf Kantor - 2019 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 47 (4):851-915.
Clower, Jason : Late Works of Mou Zongsan – Selected Essays on Chinese Philosophy.Suter Rafael - 2016 - .
References found in this work
No references found.