Effects of task definition and probability of reinforcement upon the acquisition and extinction of imitative responses

&
Journal of Experimental Psychology 60 (6):340 (1960)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1037/h0046161

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The effects of congruent and conflicting social and task feedback on the acquisition of an imitative response.John T. Lanzetta & Vera T. Kanareff - 1961 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 62 (4):322.
The effect of partial reinforcement on acquisition and extinction of a class of verbal responses.Frederick H. Kanfer - 1954 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 48 (6):424.
Within-subject partial reinforcement effects: Differential extinction following nondifferential percentage of reinforcement in acquisition.Dennis G. Dyck, Roger L. Mellgren & Jeffrey A. Seybert - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 97 (3):391.
Effect of intermittent reinforcement on acquisition, extinction, and spontaneous recovery of the conditioned eyelid response.Thomas F. Hartman & David A. Grant - 1960 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 60 (2):89.
The acquisition and extinction of conditioned eyelid responses as a function of the percentage of fixed-ratio random reinforcement.David A. Grant & Lowell M. Schipper - 1952 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 43 (4):313.
Effects of constant delay of reinforcement on acquisition asymptote and resistance to extinction.Joseph A. Sgro, James A. Dyal & Ernest J. Anastasio - 1967 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 73 (4p1):634.
Resistance to extinction as a function of the amount of reinforcement present during acquisition.Bradley Reynolds - 1950 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 40 (1):46.
Acquisition and extinction under single alternation and random partial-reinforcement conditions with a 24-hour intertrial interval.C. Thomas Surridge & Abram Amsel - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 72 (3):361.
Extinction in a runway as a function of acquisition level and reinforcement percentage.Winfred F. Hill & Norman E. Spear - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 65 (5):495.
Effects of amount and percentage of reinforcement and number of acquisition trials on conditioning and extinction.Allan R. Wagner - 1961 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 62 (3):234.
The effect of continuous, partial, and varied magnitude reinforcement on acquisition and extinction.Harry G. Yamaguchi - 1961 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 61 (4):319.
Supplementary report: Acquisition, extinction, and counterconditioning with different verbal reinforcement combinations.Elsie L. Ferguson & Arnold H. Buss - 1959 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 58 (1):94.
The effect of different amounts of reinforcement upon the acquisition and extinction of a simple running response.F. A. Mote - 1944 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 34 (3):216.
A comparison of rate and contingency of classical and instrumental reinforcement upon the acquisition and extinction of the human eyelid CR.Robert A. Fleming & David A. Grant - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 72 (4):488.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
8 (#1,249,165)

6 months
2 (#1,157,335)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references