Responses

Journal of Moral Philosophy 11 (4):476-517 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this essay I respond to commentators on Ethics for Enemies, including Caspar Hare on torture and other harms imposed on an agent after his act, Suzanne Uniacke on conceptual issues related to terrorism, Thomas Hurka on right reason and proportionality conditions in the justice of going to war, Jeff McMahan on liability, proportionality, and harm in jus ad bellum, and Gabriella Blum and John Goldberg on the moral and legal status of action prompted by bad intentions.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Preferred patterns of motor and verbal responses.Robert S. Lincoln & Lawrence T. Alexander - 1955 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 50 (2):106.
An attempt to condition hand withdrawal responses in human subjects.H. Cason - 1935 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 18 (3):307.
How to defend response moralism.Allan Hazlett - 2009 - British Journal of Aesthetics 49 (3):241-255.
Operant conditioning and associated electromyogram responses.David G. Rice - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (6):908.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-09-03

Downloads
22 (#692,982)

6 months
8 (#347,798)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Frances Kamm
Harvard University

Citations of this work

Harm: Omission, Preemption, Freedom.Nathan Hanna - 2016 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 93 (2):251-73.
Considering Intentions in Decision Making: What Is So Odd about It?Anton Markoč - 2017 - Journal of Social Philosophy 48 (4):481-498.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references