Planning as refinement search: a unified framework for evaluating design tradeoffs in partial-order planning

Artificial Intelligence 76 (1-2):167-238 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Why in planning the myth of the framework is anything but that.Andreas Faludi - 1998 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 28 (3):381-399.
Can We Plan Science?: (Semantics and Pitfalls.Michael J. Moravcsik - 1984 - Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 4 (4):361-378.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-12-22

Downloads
3 (#1,519,925)

6 months
3 (#445,838)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Planning in a hierarchy of abstraction spaces.Earl D. Sacerdoti - 1974 - Artificial Intelligence 5 (2):115-135.
Planning for conjunctive goals.David Chapman - 1987 - Artificial Intelligence 32 (3):333-377.
Planning as search: A quantitative approach.Richard E. Korf - 1987 - Artificial Intelligence 33 (1):65-88.
Automatically generating abstractions for planning.Craig A. Knoblock - 1994 - Artificial Intelligence 68 (2):243-302.
O-Plan: The open planning architecture.Ken Currie & Austin Tate - 1991 - Artificial Intelligence 52 (1):49-86.

View all 9 references / Add more references