Can Merging a Capability Approach with Effectual Processes Help Us Define a Permissible Action Range for AI Robotics Entrepreneurship?

Philosophy of Management 17 (1):97-113 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, we first enumerate the problems that humans might face with a new type of technology such as robots with artificial intelligence (AI robots). Robotics entrepreneurs are calling for discussions about goals and values because AI robots, which are potentially more intelligent than humans, can no longer be fully understood and controlled by humans. AI robots could even develop into ethically “bad” agents and become very harmful. We consider these discussions as part of a process of developing responsible innovations in AI robotics in order to prevent catastrophic risks on a global scale. To deal with these issues, we propose the capability-effectual approach, drawing on two bodies of research: the capability approach from ethics, and the effectual process model from entrepreneurship research. The capability approach provides central human capabilities, guiding the effectual process through individual goals and aspirations in the collaborative design process of stakeholders. More precisely, by assuming and understanding correspondences between goals, purposes, desires, and aspirations in the languages of different disciplines, the capability-effectual approach clarifies both how a capability list working globally could affect the aspirations and end-goals of individuals, and how local aspirations and end-goals could either energise or limit effectual processes. Theoretically, the capability-effectual approach links the collaboration of stakeholders and the design process in responsible innovation research. Practically, this approach could potentially contribute to the robust development of AI robots by providing robotics entrepreneurs with a tool for establishing a permissible action range within which to develop AI robotics.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Graph-Based Belief Merging.Konstantinos Georgatos - 2016 - In van der Hoek Wiebe, Holliday Wesley H. & Wang Wen-Fang (eds.), Logic, Rationality, and Interaction. Springer-Verlag. pp. 101-115.
Entrepreneurship As Economics With Imagination.Saras D. Sarasvathy - 2002 - The Ruffin Series of the Society for Business Ethics 3:95-112.
capabilitarianism.Ingrid Robeyns - forthcoming - Journal of Human Development and Capabilities.
Entrepreneurship As Economics With Imagination.Saras D. Sarasvathy - 2002 - The Ruffin Series of the Society for Business Ethics 3:95-112.
Biomedical Enhancements as Justice.Jeesoo Nam - 2013 - Bioethics 29 (2):126-132.
Why the capability approach is justified.Sandrine Berges - 2007 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 24 (1):16–25.
The Ethical Dimensions of Creative Market Action.Laura Dunham - 2007 - Business and Professional Ethics Journal 26 (1-4):3-39.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-07-12

Downloads
23 (#664,515)

6 months
6 (#504,917)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Bart Gremmen
Wageningen University and Research

References found in this work

Superintelligence: paths, dangers, strategies.Nick Bostrom (ed.) - 2014 - Oxford University Press.
Experience and education.John Dewey - 1938 - West Lafayette, Ind.: Kappa Delta Pi.
.Nick Bostrom & Julian Savulescu - 2009 - Oxford University Press.

View all 18 references / Add more references