Kantian Journal 38 (4):51-80 (2019)

I proceed from the hypothesis that the difficulties in Kant’s presentation of his plan and, accordingly, the implicit reason for the critical attitude to this plan on the part of many contemporary philosophers stem from the fact that he had no theoretical link at his disposal which would offer a more solid scientific grounding for his entire system. I believe that Darwinism is such a link which bolsters the central but ungrounded thesis of the Critique of Pure Reason on the existence of a priori synthetic judgments. The synthesis of Darwinism and critical philosophy dictates, however, a substantial restructuring of the latter since some of its key elements prove to be weak in the light of modern studies and need to be revised or even reversed. The first reversal explored in this article determines the origin of the categories which are now revealed not “from the top down” where Kant sought them, i. e. not in logical functions in accordance with metaphysical deduction and not in self-consciousness as transcendental deduction claims, but “from the bottom up” if one considers things in the evolutionary dimension, i. e. in the instincts. The second reversal shifts the freedom of will which Kant placed in the same ontological basket with things in themselves at “the top,” to another level of the pyramid of ontologies, by changing dualism to pluralism because dualism is too narrow to accommodate all the autonomous components of critical philosophy. Thus spirit and freedom find a new place separate from the sphere of physical nature; the category of adaptation explains how different ontologies can coexist; while the problem of two interpretations of transcendental idealism finds a solution through their reconciliation.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5922/0207-6918-2019-4-3
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,355
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Critique of Pure Reason.I. Kant - 1787/1998 - Philosophy 59 (230):555-557.
Objective Knowledge.K. R. Popper - 1972 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 4 (2):388-398.
Kant and Nonconceptual Content.Robert Hanna - 2005 - European Journal of Philosophy 13 (2):247-290.
Problems From Kant.James Van Cleve - 2003 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (1):190-195.

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Die „consequente Denkungsart der speculativen Kritik“.Bernd Ludwig - 2010 - Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 58 (4):595-628.
Critical Philosophy of I. Kant.A. M. Sklyarova - 2016 - Дискурс 2:5-16.
The Emergence of German Idealism. [REVIEW]Damon Linker - 2000 - Review of Metaphysics 54 (2):417-418.
The Purposive Unity of Kant’s Critical Idealism.A. C. Genova - 1975 - Idealistic Studies 5 (2):177-189.


Added to PP index

Total views
5 ( #1,207,781 of 2,519,597 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #406,756 of 2,519,597 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes