Common Sense Morality versus Role Morality

Ethics and Bioethics (in Central Europe) 2 (3-4):133-143 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The main aim of this paper is to present the interesting dichotomy which is closely linked to the problems of professional ethics. This fundamental philosophic-ethical problem is known as the problem of role morality. The question which arises is: Can special social roles create their own unique moral obligations that may differ or be even inconsistent with our everyday moral requirements which arise from common sense morality (such as honesty, fair play or respect for others)? And if yes, is this conduct morally defensible or even desirable?

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Justifying group-specific common morality.Carson Strong - 2008 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (1):1-15.
Common morality and computing.Bernard Gert - 1999 - Ethics and Information Technology 1 (1):53-60.
Egoism as a Theory of Human Motives.C. D. Broad - 1949 - Hibbert Journal 48:105-114.
Common morality: Comment on Beauchamp and Childress.Oliver Rauprich - 2008 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (1):43-71.
The impossibility of a morality internal to medicine.Robert M. Veatch - 2001 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26 (6):621 – 642.
Human morality.Samuel Scheffler - 1992 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Common morality and moral reform.K. A. Wallace - 2009 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30 (1):55-68.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-07

Downloads
2 (#1,755,150)

6 months
1 (#1,459,555)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references