Arriving at an acceptable formulation of stakeholder theory

Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 13 (1):73–79 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,122

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
33 (#439,340)

6 months
3 (#643,273)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Evaluating Stakeholder Theory.J. Kaler - 2006 - Journal of Business Ethics 69 (3):249-268.
An Optimally Viable Version of Stakeholder Theory.J. Kaler - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 86 (3):297-312.
The Stakeholder Approach: A Sustainability Perspective.Don Clifton & Azlan Amran - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 98 (1):121-136.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Are there any natural rights?H. L. A. Hart - 1955 - Philosophical Review 64 (2):175-191.
The Politics of Stakeholder Theory.R. Edward Freeman - 1994 - Business Ethics Quarterly 4 (4):409-421.
Legal obligation and the duty of fair play.John Rawls - 1964 - In Sidney Hook (ed.), Law and Philosophy. New York University Press.

View all 8 references / Add more references