Responsibility and iterated knowledge

Philosophical Issues 33 (1):83-94 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I defend an iterated knowledge condition on responsibility for outcomes: one is responsible for a consequence of one's action only if one was in a position to know that, for all one was in a position to know, one's action would have that consequence.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,505

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Assertion, Implicature, and Iterated Knowledge.Eliran Haziza - 2021 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 8.
What Anti-Individualists Cannot Know A Priori.Susana Nuccetelli - 1998 - The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 45:204-210.
Evidence against pragmatic encroachment.Daniel Eaton & Timothy Pickavance - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (12):3135-3143.
Inference and Self-Knowledge.Benjamin Winokur - 2021 - Logos and Episteme 12 (1):77-98.
Being in a position to know.Juhani Yli-Vakkuri & John Hawthorne - 2022 - Philosophical Studies 179 (4):1323-1339.
Fallibilism and Knowing That One Is Not Dreaming.Stephen Hetherington - 2002 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 32 (1):83 - 102.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-08-23

Downloads
66 (#321,009)

6 months
13 (#262,790)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alex Kaiserman
University of Oxford

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Knowledge and lotteries.John Hawthorne - 2004 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Epistemology Normalized.Jeremy Goodman & Bernhard Salow - 2023 - Philosophical Review 132 (1):89-145.
Could KK Be OK?Daniel Greco - 2014 - Journal of Philosophy 111 (4):169-197.

View all 25 references / Add more references