Consensus conference on environmental values in radiation protection: A report on building consensus among experts
Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (4):593-602 (2002)
AbstractDuring the fall of 2001 (October 22–25), The Norwegian Radiation Protection Authority (NRPA) and the Agricultural University of Norway arranged a consensus conference on the protection of the environment against ionising radiation. The motive for the conference was the need to study the ethical and philosophical basis for protection of nature in its own right. The conference was funded by Nordic Nuclear Safety Research (NKS), in cooperation with the International Union of Radioecology (IUR). The National Committee for Research Ethics in Science and Technology (NENT) was hired as facilitators for the consensus process. This paper will give a brief outline of the aims and method of the conference, distinguishing these from other kinds of consensus conferences. The paper ends with some general reflections on the appropriateness of seeking consensus on ethics-related issues among experts.
Similar books and articles
Deciding Together: Bioethics and Moral Consensus.Jonathan D. Moreno - 1995 - Oxford University Press.
Consensus of expertise: The role of consensus of experts in formulating public policy and estimating facts.Robert M. Veatch - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (4):427-445.
Consensus conferences – a case study: Publiforum in switzerland with special respect to the role of lay persons and ethics. [REVIEW]Barbara Skorupinski, Heike Baranzke, Hans Werner Ingensiep & Marc Meinhardt - 2007 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 20 (1):37-52.
A Citizens' Conference on Gene Therapy in Japan: A Feasibility Study of the Consensus Conference Method in Japan. [REVIEW]Yukio Wakamatsu - 1999 - AI and Society 13 (1-2):22-43.
Democracy at its best? The consensus conference in a cross-national perspective.Annika Porsborg Nielsen, Jesper Lassen & Peter Sandøe - 2007 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 20 (1):13-35.
Disagreement, consensus, and moral integrity.Ruth Macklin - 1996 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 6 (3):289-311.
Ethics by committee: The moral authority of consensus.Jonathan D. Moreno - 1988 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 13 (4):411-432.
The epistemic significance of consensus.Aviezer Tucker - 2003 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 46 (4):501 – 521.
The epistemology and ethics of consensus: Uses and misuses of 'ethical' expertise.Rosemarie Tong - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (4):409-426.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads