Consensus conference on environmental values in radiation protection: A report on building consensus among experts

Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (4):593-602 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

During the fall of 2001 (October 22–25), The Norwegian Radiation Protection Authority (NRPA) and the Agricultural University of Norway arranged a consensus conference on the protection of the environment against ionising radiation. The motive for the conference was the need to study the ethical and philosophical basis for protection of nature in its own right. The conference was funded by Nordic Nuclear Safety Research (NKS), in cooperation with the International Union of Radioecology (IUR). The National Committee for Research Ethics in Science and Technology (NENT) was hired as facilitators for the consensus process. This paper will give a brief outline of the aims and method of the conference, distinguishing these from other kinds of consensus conferences. The paper ends with some general reflections on the appropriateness of seeking consensus on ethics-related issues among experts.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,297

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Disagreement, consensus, and moral integrity.Ruth Macklin - 1996 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 6 (3):289-311.
Ethics by committee: The moral authority of consensus.Jonathan D. Moreno - 1988 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 13 (4):411-432.
The epistemic significance of consensus.Aviezer Tucker - 2003 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 46 (4):501 – 521.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
96 (#130,330)

6 months
1 (#450,425)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Matthias Kaiser
University of Bergen

Citations of this work

The Promises and Pitfalls of Participation.Deborah Oughton - 2004 - Global Bioethics 17 (1):181-189.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references