The Philosophical Importance of the Dialogue Form for Plato

Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 26 (1):13-28 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Much has been written on Plato’s use of the dialogue form, and his complete avoidance of the usual philosophical treatise or lecture format. I will summarize some familiar points before giving my own view.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

An Interpretation of Plato's Cratylus.Simon Keller - 2000 - Phronesis 45 (4):284-305.
Form and Argument in Late Plato.Christopher Gill & Mary Margaret McCabe (eds.) - 1996 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Plato: a very short introduction.Julia Annas - 2003 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The end of dialogue in antiquity.Simon Goldhill (ed.) - 2008 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Idealist epilogue.Geoffrey Reginald Gilchrist Mure - 1978 - Oxford [Eng.]: Clarendon Press.
Plato's method of dialectic.Julius Stenzel - 1940 - New York,: Arno Press. Edited by D. J. Allan.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
118 (#146,865)

6 months
4 (#698,851)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The Parthenon and liberal education.Geoff Lehman - 2018 - Albany: SUNY Press. Edited by Michael Weinman.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references