The nature and classification of fallacies

Informal Logic: The First International Symposium. Ca: Edgepress (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,139

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Classification of Fallacies of Relevance.Douglas Walton - 2004 - Informal Logic 24 (1):71-103.
Fallacies.Robert J. Fogelin & Timothy J. Duggan - 1987 - Argumentation 1 (3):255-262.
The Nature of Classification: Relationships and kinds in the natural sciences.John S. Wilkins & Malte C. Ebach - 2013 - Palgrave-Macmillan.
Which of the fallacies are fallacies of relevance?Douglas N. Walton - 1992 - Argumentation 6 (2):237-250.
The Coherence of Hamblin’s Fallacies.Ralph Johnson - 2011 - Informal Logic 31 (4):305-317.
A critical note on J. S. mill's classification of fallacies.Giora Hon - 1991 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 42 (2):263-268.
Three fallacies.Jonathan E. Adler - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):665-666.
Le naturel est artificiel : l’héritage de la scientia scientiarum.Hope A. Olson, Jihee Beak & Inkyung Choi - 2013 - Hermès: La Revue Cognition, communication, politique 66 (2):, [ p.].
Jumping to a Conclusion: Fallacies and Standards of Proof.Douglas Walton & Thomas F. Gordon - 2009 - Informal Logic 29 (2):215-243.
Dewey decimal classification for Indology: expansion and modification of Dewey decimal classification (18) for classifying Indological books with special reference to Indian philosophy and Indian religions.Sūraja Kānta Śarma - 1979 - New Delhi: Uppal.
Depth schedules, Indian philosophy & religions, for Dewey Decimal Classification (19).Pandey S. K. Sharma - 1985 - New Delhi: Ess Ess Publications.
Fallacies in pragma-dialectical perspective.Frans H. Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst - 1987 - Argumentation 1 (3):283-301.
Naturalizing the normative and the bridges between “is” and “ought”.Katinka J. P. Quintelier & Daniel M. T. Fessler - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (5):266.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-10

Downloads
2 (#1,722,101)

6 months
1 (#1,346,405)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Textbook Treatments of Fallacies.David Hitchcock - 2023 - Argumentation 37 (2):233-245.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references