Positive Duties, Kant’s Universalizability Tests, and Contradictions

Southwest Philosophy Review 36 (1):113-120 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In this paper I am going to raise a problem for recent attempts to derive positive duties from Kant’s universalizability tests. In particular, I argue that these recent attempts are subject to reductio and that the most obvious way of patching them renders them impracticable. I begin by explaining the motivation for these attempts. Then I describe how they work and begin my attack. I conclude by considering some patches.



External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Can Positive Duties be Derived from Kant’s Categorical Imperative?Michael Yudanin - 2015 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 18 (3):595-614.
Two Dogmas of Kantian Ethics.Scott Forschler - 2013 - Journal of Value Inquiry 47 (3):255-269.
The Golden Rule Principle in African Ethics and Kant’s Categorical Imperative.Godwin Azenabor - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 10:17-23.
Kant's ethics and duties to oneself.Lara Denis - 1997 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 78 (4):321–348.
Maxims and Practical Contradictions.Richard Galvin - 2011 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 28 (4):407.
Slavery and Universalizability.Richard Galvin - 1999 - Kant Studien 90 (2):191-203.
Understanding Kant's Ethics.Michael Cholbi - 2016 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


Added to PP

635 (#23,163)

6 months
163 (#14,469)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Samuel J. M. Kahn
Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Kant.Paul Guyer - 2007 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 69 (4):767-767.

Add more references